From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754190Ab3AUN67 (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jan 2013 08:58:59 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:30216 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752612Ab3AUN65 (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jan 2013 08:58:57 -0500 Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 13:58:21 +0000 From: thornber@redhat.com To: Mike Snitzer Cc: Amit Kale , "Darrick J. Wong" , device-mapper development , "linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org" , "kent.overstreet@gmail.com" , LKML , "lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org" , Joe Thornber Subject: Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] Re: [dm-devel] Announcement: STEC EnhanceIO SSD caching software for Linux kernel Message-ID: <20130121135821.GB4919@raspberrypi> Mail-Followup-To: Mike Snitzer , Amit Kale , "Darrick J. Wong" , device-mapper development , "linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org" , "kent.overstreet@gmail.com" , LKML , "lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org" , Joe Thornber References: <50F970A3.4000403@warr.net> <20130118161135.GA3118@raspberrypi> <50F97C0F.9010405@warr.net> <50F9963A.2080608@warr.net> <20130118212543.GB6425@blackbox.djwong.org> <20130118213759.GA30278@redhat.com> <20130121130951.GA16574@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130121130951.GA16574@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 08:09:51AM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote: > dm-cache is under active review for upstream inclusion. I wouldn't > categorize the chances of dm-cache going upstream when the v3.9 merge > window opens as "very low". But even if dm-cache does go upstream it > doesn't preclude bcache and/or enhanceio from going upstream too. As I understand it bcache is being reviewed too.