From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ACPI / PM: Make acpi_bus_init_power() more robust
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 09:10:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130122071056.GB2239@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <24285515.9Jp3KUo9Px@vostro.rjw.lan>
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 03:09:01AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>
> The ACPI specification requires the _PSC method to be present under
> a device object if its power state cannot be inferred from the states
> of power resources used by it (ACPI 5, Section 7.6.2). However, it
> also requires that (for power states D0-D2 and D3hot) if the _PSn
> (n = 0, 1, 2, 3) method is present under the device object, it also
> must be executed after the power resources have been set
> appropriately for the device to go into power state Dn (D3 means
> D3hot in this case). Thus it is not clear from the specification
> whether or not the _PSn method should be executed if the initial
> configuraion of power resources used by the device indicates power
> state Dn and the _PSC method is not present.
>
> The current implementation of acpi_bus_init_power() is based on the
> assumption that it should not be necessary to execute _PSn in the
> above situation, but experience shows that in fact that assumption
> need not be satisfied. For this reason, make acpi_bus_init_power()
> always execute _PSn if the initial configuration of device power
> resources indicates power state Dn.
>
> Reported-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
You can add also,
Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
if you like. Thanks for fixing this.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-22 7:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-22 2:05 [PATCH 0/4] ACPI / PM: Initial power state checking and power state setting changes Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-22 2:09 ` [PATCH 1/4] ACPI / PM: Make acpi_bus_init_power() more robust Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-22 7:10 ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2013-01-22 2:09 ` [PATCH 2/4] ACPI / PM: Introduce helper for executing _PSn methods Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-22 2:10 ` [PATCH 3/4] ACPI / PM: Always evaluate _PSn after setting power resources Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-22 2:11 ` [PATCH 4/4] ACPI / PM: Sanitize checks in acpi_power_on_resources() Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130122071056.GB2239@intel.com \
--to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lv.zheng@intel.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox