From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752710Ab3AXJLt (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jan 2013 04:11:49 -0500 Received: from mail-bk0-f42.google.com ([209.85.214.42]:54184 "EHLO mail-bk0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751997Ab3AXJLk (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jan 2013 04:11:40 -0500 Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 09:11:34 +0000 From: Lee Jones To: Mark Brown Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] regulator: Display in use regulators in sysfs Message-ID: <20130124091134.GP15873@gmail.com> References: <20130122094624.GJ6857@gmail.com> <20130123025125.GB5727@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20130123081927.GF15873@gmail.com> <20130123155335.GC4565@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20130123155335.GC4565@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 23 Jan 2013, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 08:19:27AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Wed, 23 Jan 2013, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > We call our reference counts use count but this was in fact the original > > > design, the local reference counts got dropped due to David Brownell's > > > forceful insistance :/ > > > So I should pull the patch? > > Not sure what you mean by pull; a stright revert won't work. Sorry, perhaps I should have been clearer. Is the patch any good, or should I throw it in the bin (pull it)? > > How do you feel about being able to access it via sysfs? Good or bad > > idea? If it's a good idea, I can always change the name of the > > variable? > > That or debugfs. So the premise of the patch is good and is worth updating and upstreaming? -- Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog