From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mutex: use spin_[un]lock instead of arch_spin_[un]lock
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 18:27:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130124102747.GF12678@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130124101450.GA27602@gmail.com>
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:14:50AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 10:58:07AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >
> > > * Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Use spin_[un]lock instead of arch_spin_[un]lock in mutex-debug.h so
> > > > that we can collect the lock statistics of spin_lock_mutex from
> > > > /proc/lock_stat.
> > > >
> > > > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > kernel/mutex-debug.h | 4 ++--
> > > > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/kernel/mutex-debug.h b/kernel/mutex-debug.h
> > > > index 0799fd3..556c0bc 100644
> > > > --- a/kernel/mutex-debug.h
> > > > +++ b/kernel/mutex-debug.h
> > > > @@ -43,13 +43,13 @@ static inline void mutex_clear_owner(struct mutex *lock)
> > > > \
> > > > DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(in_interrupt()); \
> > > > local_irq_save(flags); \
> > > > - arch_spin_lock(&(lock)->rlock.raw_lock);\
> > > > + spin_lock(lock); \
> > >
> > > But in that case it could probably use the spin_lock_irqsave()
> > > primitive, right?
> >
> > Right, in that case I should use spin_lock_irqsave.
> >
> > But one question, why we use spin_lock at kernel/mutex.h,
> > while use 'local_irq_save(); arch_spin_lock' at
> > kernel/mutex-debug.h?
> >
> > Shouldn't we keep it consistent? Say use spin_lock_irqsave?
>
> I think we did it to increase performance with lockdep enabled -
> this particular lockdep annotation, given the short codepaths,
> is not that hard to verify - and if it breaks it will break a
> thousand mutex locking places in the kernel.
Thanks for the explanation.
>
> So maybe it's better to leave it alone - maybe add a comment
> that explains the reason.
Sorry, I may not get your point clearly. Should I make another patch to
convert 'local_irq_save(..); arch_spin_lock(..);' at kernel/mutex-debug.h
to spin_lock_irqsave() then?
Thanks.
--yliu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-24 10:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-24 9:22 [PATCH 1/2] lockstat: fix a typo Yuanhan Liu
2013-01-24 9:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] mutex: use spin_[un]lock instead of arch_spin_[un]lock Yuanhan Liu
2013-01-24 9:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-01-24 10:13 ` Yuanhan Liu
2013-01-24 10:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-01-24 10:27 ` Yuanhan Liu [this message]
2013-01-24 10:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-01-25 0:14 ` Andrew Morton
2013-01-25 0:50 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-01-25 0:56 ` Andrew Morton
2013-01-25 1:03 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-01-25 7:40 ` Ingo Molnar
[not found] ` <CABBm8944FSNDZ2u=PJy0CsZmz=Vm7e+Y5jX+3UFLN5NOSGRgWQ@mail.gmail.com>
2013-01-25 9:24 ` Ingo Molnar
[not found] ` <CABBm896XGVkubML9TyW_MTXMovd6nHoK0v24jbEDJOipzNqpDA@mail.gmail.com>
2013-01-29 9:01 ` Ingo Molnar
[not found] ` <CABBm8979+XVRA-MQRdczMbStJR7DyPwNUvQL+RTuQL0sECOo8g@mail.gmail.com>
2013-01-29 9:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-01-24 20:03 ` [tip:core/locking] locking/stat: Fix a typo tip-bot for Yuanhan Liu
2013-02-22 12:20 ` tip-bot for Yuanhan Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130124102747.GF12678@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com \
--to=yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).