From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753627Ab3AXLj0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jan 2013 06:39:26 -0500 Received: from mail-ee0-f47.google.com ([74.125.83.47]:51411 "EHLO mail-ee0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752863Ab3AXLjV (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jan 2013 06:39:21 -0500 Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 12:39:17 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Andi Kleen Cc: mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, akpm@linux-foundation.org, acme@redhat.com, eranian@google.com, jolsa@redhat.com, namhyung@kernel.org Subject: Re: perf PMU support for Haswell v7 Message-ID: <20130124113917.GD32259@gmail.com> References: <1358455012-12287-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1358455012-12287-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Andi Kleen wrote: > [Updated version for the latest master tree and fixes. See > end for details. All feedback addressed. Ready for merging.] Could we try a minimal, obvious hardware-enablement series first, with all the optional features left out in the first step? Your patches look mostly shaped in that way already, so this would be mostly a resend of just the basic bits. ( I also finally got access to real Haswell hardware so I'll be able to try these out and verify them. The patches are way too large to be applied blindly. ) Thanks, Ingo