From: Leandro Lucarella <leandro.lucarella@sociomantic.com>
To: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Doubts about listen backlog and tcp_max_syn_backlog
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 13:22:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130124122223.GQ4608@sociomantic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <510039C8.7040401@hp.com>
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 11:28:08AM -0800, Rick Jones wrote:
> >Then if syncookies are enabled, the time spent in connect() shouldn't be
> >bigger than 3 seconds even if SYNs are being "dropped" by listen, right?
>
> Do you mean if "ESTABLISHED" connections are dropped because the
> listen queue is full? I don't think I would put that as "SYNs being
> dropped by listen" - too easy to confuse that with an actual
> dropping of a SYN segment.
I was just kind of quoting the name given by netstat: "SYNs to LISTEN
sockets dropped" (for kernel 3.0, I noticed newer kernels don't have
this stat anymore, or the name was changed). I still don't know if we
are talking about the same thing.
> But yes, I would not expect a connect() call to remain incomplete
> for any longer than it took to receive an SYN|ACK from the other
> end.
So the only reason to experience these high times spent in connect()
should be because a SYN or SYN|ACK was actually loss in a lower layer,
like an error in the network device or a transmission error?
> That would be 3 (,9, 21, etc...) seconds on a kernel with 3
> seconds as the initial retransmission timeout.
Which can't be changed without recompiling, right?
Thanks!
--
Leandro Lucarella
sociomantic labs GmbH
http://www.sociomantic.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-24 12:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-22 16:10 Doubts about listen backlog and tcp_max_syn_backlog Leandro Lucarella
2013-01-22 16:45 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-01-22 16:59 ` Leandro Lucarella
2013-01-22 17:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-01-22 18:17 ` Rick Jones
2013-01-22 18:42 ` Leandro Lucarella
2013-01-22 22:01 ` Rick Jones
2013-01-23 10:47 ` Leandro Lucarella
2013-01-23 19:28 ` Rick Jones
2013-01-24 12:22 ` Leandro Lucarella [this message]
2013-01-24 18:44 ` Rick Jones
2013-01-24 19:21 ` Leandro Lucarella
2013-01-25 6:12 ` Nivedita SInghvi
2013-01-25 10:05 ` Leandro Lucarella
2013-01-28 2:48 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2013-01-28 5:21 ` Vijay Subramanian
2013-01-28 14:40 ` Leandro Lucarella
2013-01-28 13:08 ` Leandro Lucarella
2013-01-28 2:49 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2013-01-23 20:48 ` Vijay Subramanian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130124122223.GQ4608@sociomantic.com \
--to=leandro.lucarella@sociomantic.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rick.jones2@hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox