From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Aristeu Rozanski <aris@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] userns: improve uid/gid map collision detection
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 16:46:12 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130124164612.af6de6f3.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130124152859.GP17632@redhat.com>
On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 10:28:59 -0500
Aristeu Rozanski <aris@redhat.com> wrote:
> userns: improve uid/gid map collision detection
>
> Initial implementation of the uid/gid maps (/proc/<pid>/{u,g}id_map) will
> enforce that the UID and GID maps be written in strict order as a simple
> way to check for range collision:
> local id mapped to count/range
> 0 1000 50
> (ids 0-50 get mapped to 1000-1050)
> 100 2120 10
> 500 5000 200
> so for each new entry, local id must be bigger than last local id (plus
> count) and the ids it maps to also needs to be bigger than the last
> entry (plus count).
>
> This makes impossible to have a use case like this:
> local id mapped to count/range
> 0 1000 1
> 48 500 20
>
> because while 48+20 > 0+1, 500+20 < 1000+1.
>
> This patch implements a more elaborate collision detection allowing any
> order to be used.
>
> v2: improved the patch description as requested by Andrew
Thanks.
> --- a/kernel/user_namespace.c
> +++ b/kernel/user_namespace.c
> @@ -521,6 +521,28 @@ struct seq_operations proc_projid_seq_operations = {
>
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(id_map_mutex);
>
> +#define in_range(b,first,len) ((b)>=(first)&&(b)<(first)+(len))
eek, a macro! Macros are always bad.
This one is bad because
a) it's a macro
b) it evaluates its args multiple times and hence will cause nasty
bugs if called with expressions-with-side-effects.
c) it evaluates its args multiple times and if called with
non-trivial expressions the compiler might not be able to CSE those
expressions, leading to code bloat.
Add lo, this patch:
--- a/kernel/user_namespace.c~userns-improve-uid-gid-map-collision-detection-fix
+++ a/kernel/user_namespace.c
@@ -521,7 +521,11 @@ struct seq_operations proc_projid_seq_op
static DEFINE_MUTEX(id_map_mutex);
-#define in_range(b,first,len) ((b)>=(first)&&(b)<(first)+(len))
+static bool in_range(u32 b, u32 first, u32 len)
+{
+ return b >= first && b < first + len;
+}
+
static inline int extent_collision(struct uid_gid_map *new_map,
struct uid_gid_extent *extent)
{
reduces the user_namespace.o text from 4822 bytes to 4727 with
gcc-4.4.4. This is a remarkably large difference.
btw, what the heck is up with CONFIG_UIDGID_CONVERTED? That thing
prevents userns from being compiled in an allmodconfig build, which is
rather undesirable. Isn't there a better, more user-friendly way of
doing this?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-25 0:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-23 16:02 [PATCH] userns: improve uid/gid map collision detection Aristeu Rozanski
2013-01-24 4:44 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2013-01-24 15:28 ` [PATCH v2] " Aristeu Rozanski
2013-01-25 0:46 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2013-01-25 2:00 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-01-25 14:03 ` Aristeu Rozanski
2013-01-26 2:31 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-01-28 14:25 ` Aristeu Rozanski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130124164612.af6de6f3.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aris@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox