From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755825Ab3AXWGt (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jan 2013 17:06:49 -0500 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:49589 "EHLO out5-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755245Ab3AXWGj (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jan 2013 17:06:39 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: 4Nn5LV3SX5OIIZCS/jZ7ahgQqAHUmIqoWSUzWEzmbTXD 1359065199 Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 14:06:37 -0800 From: Greg KH To: fangxiaozhi 00110321 Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zihan@huawei.com, Lin.Lei@huawei.com, neil.yi@huawei.com, wangyuhua@huawei.com, huqiao36@huawei.com, balbi@ti.com, mdharm-usb@one-eyed-alien.net, sebastian@breakpoint.cc Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1]linux-usb:Define a new macro for USB storage match rules Message-ID: <20130124220637.GA3873@kroah.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 02:04:52PM +0800, fangxiaozhi 00110321 wrote: > From: fangxiaozhi > > 1. Define a new macro for USB storage match rules: > matching with Vendor ID and interface descriptors. > > Signed-off-by: fangxiaozhi > -------------------------------------------------------------------- You sent me two patches, both marked with [1/1], yet they have to be applied in a specific order. Which one? I don't think you want me to guess :) Please put the proper order in the patch number, i.e. [1/2], [2/2], and so on. If you use git, it will generate these patches, and the numbers, automatically for you. Same thing for quilt. I strongly recommend you use a tool like this to get this stuff right. Please resend both of them properly. thanks, greg k-h