From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932245Ab3AYTAx (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jan 2013 14:00:53 -0500 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:37269 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932094Ab3AYTAv (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Jan 2013 14:00:51 -0500 Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 20:03:40 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , Ingo Molnar , X86 ML , Greg Kroah-Hartman , LKML , devel@linuxdriverproject.org, olaf@aepfle.de, apw@canonical.com, jasowang@redhat.com, Thomas Gleixner , JBeulich@suse.com, Dmitry Torokhov , "K. Y. Srinivasan" , Haiyang Zhang Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 2/2] x86: Make Linux guest support optional Message-ID: <20130125190340.GC4973@pd.tnic> Mail-Followup-To: Borislav Petkov , Dmitry Torokhov , "H. Peter Anvin" , Ingo Molnar , X86 ML , Greg Kroah-Hartman , LKML , devel@linuxdriverproject.org, olaf@aepfle.de, apw@canonical.com, jasowang@redhat.com, Thomas Gleixner , JBeulich@suse.com, Dmitry Torokhov , "K. Y. Srinivasan" , Haiyang Zhang References: <20130125100655.GC23404@pd.tnic> <1359136777-4512-2-git-send-email-bp@alien8.de> <20130125181251.GA5563@core.coreip.homeip.net> <20130125183213.GB1380@pd.tnic> <20130125184231.GB5563@core.coreip.homeip.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130125184231.GB5563@core.coreip.homeip.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:42:32AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > No, not really as EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() in no way implies that the code > using it lives in the mainline. I didn't say that - I said "any code (proprietary included) can link to those symbols" meaning that I cannot possibly convert proprietary code to which I don't have access to, vs GPL code which is out there. > Also, EXPORT_SYMBOL() does not imply that it forms an ABI and can't be > changed ever. And yet, I don't want to be on the receiving end of the complaints when those do change. But that's beside the point. So I think we're on the same page: I'll make everything using x86_hyper* depend on CONFIG_HYPERVISOR_GUEST and all are happy. Thanks. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. --