From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753646Ab3AZMJA (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Jan 2013 07:09:00 -0500 Received: from mail-ee0-f45.google.com ([74.125.83.45]:47263 "EHLO mail-ee0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753464Ab3AZMI5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Jan 2013 07:08:57 -0500 Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 13:08:53 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Jan Beulich , mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3, v2] x86: xor-block handling adjustments Message-ID: <20130126120853.GE13445@gmail.com> References: <5093E40902000078000A6147@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <20130124171554.GC11772@gmail.com> <51017028.3020001@zytor.com> <51024E9602000078000B97A2@nat28.tlf.novell.com> <5102DD08.9080204@zytor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5102DD08.9080204@zytor.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 01/25/2013 12:21 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> > >> I don't see anything wrong, except that I can't *find* patch 3/3 either > >> in my inbox nor on LKML... > > > > I can certainly resend the whole set, but our email system even > > got a delivery confirmation from yours on patch 3 (other than > > e.g. from Ingo's, and all of this identical to 0...2). > > > > Or see https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1688991/, according > > to which you even responded to it (which is the concern Ingo was > > referring to). > > > > Ah yes, now I have the context. > > And with that, I have to NAK the patch. I did talk to the KVM > people and they confirmed that this is NOT something they > want. They do not program VT-x to VMEXIT on CR0 changes. > > So this is Xen-specific, and penalizing other hypervisors is > wrong. Are patches #1 and #2 still OK? Thanks, Ingo