From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754892Ab3A0AKs (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Jan 2013 19:10:48 -0500 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:30927 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754764Ab3A0AKp (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Jan 2013 19:10:45 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,545,1355126400"; d="scan'208";a="282615810" Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 01:10:43 +0100 From: Samuel Ortiz To: Linus Walleij Cc: Linus Walleij , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Anmar Oueja , Loic Pallardy , Patrice Chotard , Michel Jaouen Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: prcmu: delete pin control helpers Message-ID: <20130127001043.GC1174@sortiz-mobl> References: <1357546398-9541-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@stericsson.com> <20130122032538.GI7409@sortiz-mobl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Linus, On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 02:25:35PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 4:25 AM, Samuel Ortiz wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 09:13:18AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > >> From: Linus Walleij > >> > >> These static inlines are duplicating the task now done by the > >> Nomadik pinctrl drivers, so delete them from the prcmu static > >> inlines, also delete the register definitions as these should > >> only be known by the pinctrl driver. > >> > >> Cc: Loic Pallardy > >> Cc: Patrice Chotard > >> Cc: Michel Jaouen > >> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij > >> --- > >> Sam, this is a pure clean-up patch following the v3.8 merge > >> window. These inlines are completely unused in the kernel and > >> I'd simply apply it to the -rc series but it's up to you. > > > > Unless it really makes your life easier, I like to keep my -rc pull requests > > for fixes only. > > I'll apply it to my for-next branch for now. > > OK in that case, can I take it through the ARM SoC tree > with your ACK, because I have other cleanups that depend on > this one? Fair enough: Acked-by: Samuel Ortiz Cheers, Samuel. -- Intel Open Source Technology Centre http://oss.intel.com/