From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755707Ab3A1XoR (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jan 2013 18:44:17 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:43178 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755601Ab3A1XoJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jan 2013 18:44:09 -0500 Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:44:07 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Hugh Dickins Cc: Petr Holasek , Andrea Arcangeli , Izik Eidus , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/11] ksm: remove old stable nodes more thoroughly Message-Id: <20130128154407.16a623a4.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 18:01:59 -0800 (PST) Hugh Dickins wrote: > +static int remove_all_stable_nodes(void) > +{ > + struct stable_node *stable_node; > + int nid; > + int err = 0; > + > + for (nid = 0; nid < nr_node_ids; nid++) { > + while (root_stable_tree[nid].rb_node) { > + stable_node = rb_entry(root_stable_tree[nid].rb_node, > + struct stable_node, node); > + if (remove_stable_node(stable_node)) { > + err = -EBUSY; It's a bit rude to overwrite remove_stable_node()'s return value. > + break; /* proceed to next nid */ > + } > + cond_resched(); Why is this here? > + } > + } > + return err; > +}