From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755737Ab3A1P5b (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jan 2013 10:57:31 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58071 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751882Ab3A1P53 (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jan 2013 10:57:29 -0500 Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 10:57:23 -0500 From: David Teigland To: Tejun Heo Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christine Caulfield , cluster-devel@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/14] dlm: don't use idr_remove_all() Message-ID: <20130128155723.GC16789@redhat.com> References: <1359163872-1949-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <1359163872-1949-11-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1359163872-1949-11-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 05:31:08PM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote: > idr_destroy() can destroy idr by itself and idr_remove_all() is being > deprecated. > > The conversion isn't completely trivial for recover_idr_clear() as > it's the only place in kernel which makes legitimate use of > idr_remove_all() w/o idr_destroy(). Replace it with idr_remove() call > inside idr_for_each_entry() loop. It goes on top so that it matches > the operation order in recover_idr_del(). > > Only compile tested. > > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo > Cc: Christine Caulfield > Cc: David Teigland > Cc: cluster-devel@redhat.com > --- > This patch depends on an earlier idr patch and given the trivial > nature of the patch, I think it would be best to route these together > through -mm. Please holler if there's any objection. Yes, that's good for me. I'll grab the set and test the dlm bits.