From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755612Ab3A1XoJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jan 2013 18:44:09 -0500 Received: from LGEMRELSE6Q.lge.com ([156.147.1.121]:45405 "EHLO LGEMRELSE6Q.lge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755457Ab3A1XoH (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jan 2013 18:44:07 -0500 X-AuditID: 9c930179-b7d01ae000004006-e2-51070d467a88 Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 08:44:06 +0900 From: Minchan Kim To: Seth Jennings Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Andrew Morton , Dan Magenheimer , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Nitin Gupta , Robert Jennings , linux-mm@kvack.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] staging: zsmalloc: various cleanups/improvments Message-ID: <20130128234406.GC4752@blaptop> References: <1359135978-15119-1-git-send-email-sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20130128034740.GE3321@blaptop> <5106B03E.6070302@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5106B03E.6070302@linux.vnet.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:07:10AM -0600, Seth Jennings wrote: > On 01/27/2013 09:47 PM, Minchan Kim wrote: > > Hi Seth, > > > > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:46:14AM -0600, Seth Jennings wrote: > >> These patches are the first 4 patches of the zswap patchset I > >> sent out previously. Some recent commits to zsmalloc and > >> zcache in staging-next forced a rebase. While I was at it, Nitin > >> (zsmalloc maintainer) requested I break these 4 patches out from > >> the zswap patchset, since they stand on their own. > > > > [2/4] and [4/4] is okay to merge current zsmalloc in staging but > > [1/4] and [3/4] is dependent on zswap so it should be part of > > zswap patchset. > > Just to clarify, patches 1 and 3 are _not_ dependent on zswap. They > just introduce changes that are only needed by zswap. I don't think so. If zswap might be not merged, we don't need [1, 3] at the moment. You could argue that [1, 3] make zsmalloc more flexible and I agree. BUT I want it when we have needs. It would be not too late. So [1,3] should be part of zswap patchset. > > Seth > > -- > To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in > the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, > see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . > Don't email: email@kvack.org -- Kind regards, Minchan Kim