Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the input tree

[Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>]

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:59:17AM +1100, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 02:44:43PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 02:09:31PM -0800, Joe Millenbach wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Dmitry Torokhov
> > > <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 06:46:15AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > >> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 08:44:24PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > >> > Hi Greg,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Today's linux-next merge of the tty tree got a conflict in
> > > >> > drivers/input/keyboard/Kconfig between commit 6f2ac009f29b ("Input:
> > > >> > goldfish - virtual input event driver") from the input tree and commit
> > > >> > 4f73bc4dd3e8 ("tty: Added a CONFIG_TTY option to allow removal of TTY")
> > > >> > from the tty tree.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I fixed it up (see below - I am not sure if GOLDFISH_EVENTS needs TTY or
> > > >> > not) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action is required).
> > > >> >
> > > >> > --
> > > >> > Cheers,
> > > >> > Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
> > > >> >
> > > >> > diff --cc drivers/input/keyboard/Kconfig
> > > >> > index 078305e,008f96a..0000000
> > > >> > --- a/drivers/input/keyboard/Kconfig
> > > >> > +++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/Kconfig
> > > >> > @@@ -479,16 -482,8 +482,18 @@@ config KEYBOARD_SAMSUN
> > > >> >       To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the
> > > >> >       module will be called samsung-keypad.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > + if TTY
> > > >> > +
> > > >> >  +config KEYBOARD_GOLDFISH_EVENTS
> > > >> >  +  depends on GOLDFISH
> > > >> >  +  tristate "Generic Input Event device for Goldfish"
> > > >> >  +  help
> > > >> >  +    Say Y here to get an input event device for the Goldfish virtual
> > > >>
> > > >> Looks good, thanks.
> > > >
> > > > Greg,
> > > >
> > > > Please drop 4f73bc4dd3e8563ef4109f293a092820dff66d92, at least the parts
> > > > related to input. As far as I know nothing except serport driver
> > > > depends on tty and we do not need to introduce this kind of
> > > > dependencie. Anyone needing slim config can simply try disabling
> > > > input (or parts of it) without needing an artificial dependencies.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Dmitry
> > > 
> > > Dmitry and Greg,
> > > 
> > > SERIO needs TTY, 
> > 
> > No it does not. There is only one (1) serio driver that needs the tty
> > layer and that is serport.
> > 
> > > and the majority of the input changes are adding "depends on TTY" to
> > > things that "select SERIO" as they break the dependency chain.  In
> > > other words, enabling a component that selects SERIO will turn SERIO
> > > on even when SERIO depends on TTY and TTY is disabled.
> > 
> > Except that it does not. Are you confusing SERIO with SERIAL by any
> > chance?
> 
> A few serial drivers don't actually need the TTY layer.  However, most

Can you please tell me why you are talking about serial layer here?

> do, including many that don't obviously appear to at first glance.  For
> instance, MOUSE_PS2 doesn't *appear* to need TTY, but without the
> dependency, having MOUSE_PS2 enabled and TTY disabled produces a kernel
> that doesn't build.

Compile log please.

>  (Also keep in mind that many other headers include
> <linux/tty.h>.)  Many of the drivers that don't actually need TTY
> nonetheless won't typically appear on systems small enough to want to
> compile out TTY.
> 
> In any case, it seems simple enough to whittle down dependencies on TTY
> later on, but for a first pass, the conserative approach seems
> preferable.

However my approach would be not to touch anything except serport
driver (which indeed depends on TTY layer).

> 
> > In the future it would be nice if you CCed people involved in the
> > subsystem you are changing.
> 
> Such as the maintainers of the TTY and serial layers?  Alan Cox OKed
> this conservative addition of dependencies in the original version of
> this change, and Greg had no complaints at the time.

Maintainer of _SERIO_ (not SERIAL, SERIO) layer, yours truly.

-- 
Dmitry