From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754227Ab3A2Blm (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jan 2013 20:41:42 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:20136 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751518Ab3A2Blj (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jan 2013 20:41:39 -0500 Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 22:41:26 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Stephane Eranian Cc: LKML , Peter Zijlstra , "mingo@elte.hu" , "ak@linux.intel.com" , Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] perf stat: add interval printing Message-ID: <20130129014125.GD15351@infradead.org> References: <1358860732-4435-1-git-send-email-eranian@google.com> <1358860732-4435-3-git-send-email-eranian@google.com> <20130125025247.GA16249@infradead.org> <20130128175938.GA15351@infradead.org> <20130128192151.GC15351@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:45:56PM +0100, Stephane Eranian escreveu: > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 8:21 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo > wrote: > > Em Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 07:26:17PM +0100, Stephane Eranian escreveu: > >> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo > >> wrote: > >> > Em Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 04:21:11PM +0100, Stephane Eranian escreveu: > >> >> My patches are always relative to: > >> >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip.tip.git > >> >> Do you still need to rebase against your tree? > >> > Well, userspace code normally is developed on my tree and eventually > >> > goes to the one you mentioned. If you make sure that now, that both are > >> > synched after some weeks, then probably it'll work with my tree. > >> How's the kernel proper side of your tree sync'd with tip.git? I cannot have > >> the kernel patches for one tree and the perf patches for another. That's a > >> lot of overhead especially when it comes to testing. > > Normally regularly, right now it seems all is synched. > Ok, will resubmit the series against your tree then. Also everytime Ingo merges I rebase my tree against tip/perf/core, if you ever need something that is in some other branch that everybody agrees will go upstream, like tip/perf/urgent or Linus's, just let me know and I'll coordinate with Ingo and merge it into acme/perf/core. Talking about that I need to merge tip/perf/urgent, Jiri needs that precise attribute revert... - Arnaldo