From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756772Ab3A2EkX (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jan 2013 23:40:23 -0500 Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:44092 "EHLO cavan.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754159Ab3A2EkR (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Jan 2013 23:40:17 -0500 Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 04:40:13 +0000 From: Matthew Garrett To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Secure Boot: More controversial changes Message-ID: <20130129044013.GC14395@srcf.ucam.org> References: <1359391662-26120-1-git-send-email-matthew.garrett@nebula.com> <51072E84.4080509@zytor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51072E84.4080509@zytor.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mjg59@cavan.codon.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on cavan.codon.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 06:05:56PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > These at the very least need some kind of CONFIG_WEAK_SECURE_BOOT > option or something like that. Given Eric's views on the kexec patch (and given that there's no point in the hibernate one if kexec's available...), I'm not planning on pushing these until there's a plausible story for limiting kexec to signed images. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org