From: Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, vgoyal@redhat.com, horms@verge.net.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86 e820: Introduce memmap=resetusablemap for kdump usage
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 10:47:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201301291047.34957.trenn@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE9FiQWDcFR+6L-GiR6rk60TC0zH=xewyH_h1Rx_QB+8PTiU3Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Tuesday, January 29, 2013 03:10:38 AM Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 5:11 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
> >> So I guess the final patch should be:
> >> - Add a new e820 type:
> >> E820_KDUMP_RESERVED /* Originally usable memory where the crashed
> >> kernel kernel resided in */
> >> - Use Yinghai's last posted patch, but instead of:
> >> + e820_update_range(0, ULLONG_MAX, E820_RAM,
> >> + E820_RESERVED);
> >> ...
> >> + e820_remove_range(start_at, mem_size, E820_RESERVED, 0);
> >> do:
> >> + e820_update_range(0, ULLONG_MAX, E820_RAM,
> >> + E820_KDUMP_RESERVED);
> >> ...
> >> + e820_remove_range(start_at, mem_size, E820_KDUMP_RESERVED, 0);
> >>
> >> - Come up with another memmap=kdump_reserve_ram memmap option name
> >> or however it should get named...
> >>
> >> If this proposal gets accepted, I can send a tested patch...
> >>
> >
> > Yes, this is much saner. There really shouldn't need to be an option,
> > even; since the tools need to be modified anyway, just modify the actual
> > memory map data structure itself.
>
> yes,
>
> kexec-tools will change that to E820_KDUMP_RESERVED (or other good name).
>
> We only need to update kernel to get old max_pfn by
> checking E820_KDUMP_RESERVED.
Wait, above proposal does not include kexec-tools mangling of the
e820 table, for several reasons:
- Keep the boot interface clean and pass the original table
- Only one possible error source on e820 table modifications
- While hpa proposed kexec-tools to pass a modified e820 table to
make things easier, exactly the opposite is the case:
If kexec-tools and the kernel modify the table, things are more
complex and hard to understand in case of debugging where things
went wrong
- It's really easy to do that in the kernel. As shown above it should
simply be this line to change usable areas into E820_KDUMP_RESERVED
ones:
e820_update_range(0, ULLONG_MAX, E820_RAM, E820_KDUMP_RESERVED);
and possibly slight adjusting when the memmap=X#Y memory
the kdump kernel uses is added (has to override E820_KDUMP_RESERVED
areas with usable memory again)
My previously posted kexec-tools patches should simply work,
it's just that the memmap option name changes to:
memmap=kdump_reserve_ram
This is what I proposed and is IMO the best and less complex
way to go. I guess I still wait another day for comments and
will send something if you agree.
Thomas
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-29 9:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-22 15:20 [PATCH 0/2] Only parse exactmap once, introduce memmap=resetusablemap Thomas Renninger
2013-01-22 15:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86 e820: Check for exactmap appearance when parsing first memmap option Thomas Renninger
2013-01-22 19:33 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-29 1:09 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-01-29 2:01 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-22 15:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86 e820: Introduce memmap=resetusablemap for kdump usage Thomas Renninger
2013-01-22 15:54 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-01-22 16:23 ` Thomas Renninger
2013-01-22 16:32 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-01-22 20:06 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-24 4:07 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-29 1:05 ` Thomas Renninger
2013-01-29 1:11 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-01-29 2:10 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-29 2:11 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-01-29 2:19 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-29 2:20 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-01-29 2:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-01-29 2:31 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-01-29 3:33 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-01-29 9:47 ` Thomas Renninger [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201301291047.34957.trenn@suse.de \
--to=trenn@suse.de \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox