From: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
swarren@wwwdotorg.org, linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
mathieu.poirier@linaro.org, Joseph Lo <josephl@nvidia.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/4] cpufreq: conservative: call dbs_check_cpu only when necessary
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 17:53:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130130165321.GD30559@balto.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKohpompi7mzd+XmrUzJ4T=apzpmUcryHaBfQWUoO5G3+4y=_Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 09:23:22PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 30 January 2013 18:30, Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org> wrote:
> > Modify conservative timer to not resample CPU utilization if recently
> > sampled from another SW coordinated core.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabio.baltieri@linaro.org>
>
> We are again doing the same mistake which i fixed with:
>
> commit 4471a34f9a1f2da220272e823bdb8e8fa83a7661
> Author: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> Date: Fri Oct 26 00:47:42 2012 +0200
>
> cpufreq: governors: remove redundant code
Can't argue with this, but the two had some subdle differences (namely
th two dbs_info structures) and I opted to not mess up forcing some
non-obvious common code.
Feel free to suggest a strategy.
Thanks,
Fabio
--
Fabio Baltieri
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-30 16:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-30 12:59 [PATCH v7 0/5] cpufreq: handle SW coordinated CPUs Fabio Baltieri
2013-01-30 13:00 ` [PATCH v7 1/4] " Fabio Baltieri
2013-01-30 15:02 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-01-30 16:23 ` Fabio Baltieri
2013-01-30 16:51 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-01-30 16:57 ` Fabio Baltieri
2013-01-30 21:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-30 13:00 ` [PATCH v7 2/4] cpufreq: ondemand: call dbs_check_cpu only when necessary Fabio Baltieri
2013-01-30 15:51 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-01-30 16:46 ` Fabio Baltieri
2013-01-30 17:11 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-01-31 8:39 ` Fabio Baltieri
2013-01-31 8:42 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-01-31 9:06 ` Fabio Baltieri
2013-01-31 9:11 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-01-30 13:00 ` [PATCH v7 3/4] cpufreq: conservative: " Fabio Baltieri
2013-01-30 15:53 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-01-30 16:53 ` Fabio Baltieri [this message]
2013-01-30 17:12 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-01-30 13:00 ` [PATCH v7 4/4] cpufreq: ondemand: use all CPUs in update_sampling_rate Fabio Baltieri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130130165321.GD30559@balto.lan \
--to=fabio.baltieri@linaro.org \
--cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=josephl@nvidia.com \
--cc=linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox