public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
To: aris@redhat.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 9/9] devcg: propagate local changes down the hierarchy
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 21:35:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130130213513.GG8507@mail.hallyn.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130130171102.390708521@napanee.usersys.redhat.com>

Quoting aris@redhat.com (aris@redhat.com):
Still looking over the code changes, but:

>  static int devcgroup_access_write(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cftype *cft,
> --- github.orig/Documentation/cgroups/devices.txt	2013-01-29 14:39:17.721843991 -0500
> +++ github/Documentation/cgroups/devices.txt	2013-01-30 10:03:30.536076528 -0500
> @@ -50,3 +50,69 @@ task to a new cgroup.  (Again we'll prob
>  
>  A cgroup may not be granted more permissions than the cgroup's
>  parent has.
> +
> +4. Hierarchy
> +
> +device cgroups maintain hierarchy by making sure never a cgroup has more

making sure a cgroup never has...

> +access permissions than its parent.  Every time an entry is written to
> +a cgroup's devices.deny file, all its children will have that entry removed
> +from the the whitelist and all the locally set whitelist entries re-evaluated.

s/the the/their/

and

...whitelist entries will be re-evaluated.

> +In case one of the locally set whitelist entries would provide more access
> +than the cgroup's parent, it'll be removed from the whitelist.
> +
> +Example:
> +      A
> +     / \
> +        B
> +
> +    group        behavior	exceptions
> +    A            allow		"b 8:* rwm", "c 116:1 rw"
> +    B            deny		"c 1:3 rwm", "c 116:2 rwm", "b 3:* rwm"
> +
> +If a device is denied in group A:
> +	# echo "c 116:* r" > A/devices.deny
> +it'll propagate down and after revalidating B's entries, the whitelist entry
> +"c 116:2 rwm" will be removed:
> +
> +    group        whitelist entries                        denied devices
> +    A            all                                      "b 8:* rwm", "c 116:* rw"
> +    B            "c 1:3 rwm", "b 3:* rwm"                 all the rest
> +
> +In case parent behavior or exceptions change and local settings are not
> +allowed anymore, they'll be deleted.
> +
> +Notice that new whitelist entries will not be propagated:
> +      A
> +     / \
> +        B
> +
> +    group        whitelist entries                        denied devices
> +    A            "c 1:3 rwm", "c 1:5 r"                   all the rest
> +    B            "c 1:3 rwm", "c 1:5 r"                   all the rest
> +
> +when adding "c *:3 rwm":
> +	# echo "c *:3 rwm" >A/devices.allow
> +
> +the result:
> +    group        whitelist entries                        denied devices
> +    A            "c *:3 rwm", "c 1:5 r"                   all the rest
> +    B            "c 1:3 rwm", "c 1:5 r"                   all the rest
> +
> +but not it'll be possible to add new entries to B:

"but now" ?

> +	# echo "c 2:3 rwm" >B/devices.allow
> +	# echo "c 50:3 r" >B/devices.allow
> +or even
> +	# echo "c *:3 rwm" >B/devices.allow
> +
> +4.1 Hierarchy (internal implementation)
> +
> +device cgroups is implemented internally using a behavior (ALLOW, DENY) and a
> +list of exceptions.  The internal state is controlled using the same user
> +interface to preserve compatibility.  A change in behavior (writing "a" to

... to preserve compatibility with the previous whitelist-only
implementation.

> +devices.deny or devices.allow) will be propagated down the hierarchy as well

"as well as" ?

> +new exceptions that will reduce the access to devices (an exception when
> +behavior is ALLOW).  Each cgroup will have its local behavior and exception
> +list to keep track what was set by the user for that cgroup in specific.  For
> +every propagated change, the effective rules will be built starting with
> +parent's rules and the locally set behavior and exceptions in case they still
> +apply, otherwise those will be lost.
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  reply	other threads:[~2013-01-30 21:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-30 17:11 [PATCH v4 0/9] devcg: introduce proper hierarchy support aris
2013-01-30 17:11 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] device_cgroup: prepare exception list handling functions for two lists aris
2013-01-30 19:34   ` Serge E. Hallyn
2013-01-30 17:11 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] devcg: reorder device exception functions aris
2013-01-30 19:44   ` Serge E. Hallyn
2013-01-30 17:11 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] device_cgroup: keep track of local group settings aris
2013-01-30 20:01   ` Serge E. Hallyn
2013-01-30 17:11 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] devcg: expand may_access() logic aris
2013-01-30 20:09   ` Serge E. Hallyn
2013-01-30 17:11 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] devcg: prepare may_access() for hierarchy support aris
2013-01-30 20:30   ` Serge E. Hallyn
2013-01-30 17:11 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] devcg: use css_online and css_offline aris
2013-01-30 20:40   ` Serge E. Hallyn
2013-01-30 17:11 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] devcg: split single exception copy from dev_exceptions_copy() aris
2013-01-30 20:42   ` Serge E. Hallyn
2013-01-30 17:11 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] devcg: refactor dev_exception_clean() aris
2013-01-30 20:47   ` Serge E. Hallyn
2013-01-30 20:49     ` Aristeu Rozanski
2013-01-30 20:50       ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-31  2:15         ` Li Zefan
2013-01-31 15:13         ` Aristeu Rozanski
2013-01-30 17:11 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] devcg: propagate local changes down the hierarchy aris
2013-01-30 21:35   ` Serge E. Hallyn [this message]
2013-01-31  4:19   ` Serge E. Hallyn
2013-01-31 22:00     ` Aristeu Rozanski
2013-01-31  4:38   ` Serge E. Hallyn
2013-01-31 22:03     ` Aristeu Rozanski
2013-02-01 19:09     ` [PATCH v5 " Aristeu Rozanski
2013-02-02 16:13       ` Serge E. Hallyn
2013-02-04 15:03         ` Aristeu Rozanski
2013-02-04 15:17           ` Serge Hallyn
2013-02-02 16:20       ` Serge E. Hallyn
2013-02-04 15:09         ` Aristeu Rozanski
2013-02-05 18:36     ` [PATCH v6 " Aristeu Rozanski
2013-02-09  3:53       ` Serge E. Hallyn
2013-02-11 14:30         ` Aristeu Rozanski
2013-02-09  4:04       ` Serge E. Hallyn
2013-02-11 14:32         ` Aristeu Rozanski
2013-02-11 17:42           ` Serge E. Hallyn
2013-02-11 18:38             ` Aristeu Rozanski
2013-02-11 18:52               ` Serge E. Hallyn
2013-02-11 19:02                 ` Aristeu Rozanski
2013-02-11 20:47                   ` Serge Hallyn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130130213513.GG8507@mail.hallyn.com \
    --to=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=aris@redhat.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=serge.hallyn@canonical.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox