From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
x86@kernel.org, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>
Subject: Re: Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 2c on CPU 0.
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 14:18:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130131131805.GG4926@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <510A2B1C.1060108@suse.cz>
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 09:28:12AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> And, does it happen if you switch all of them but NMI wtd in there?
No, but something else happens. Here's the whole dance:
1. Switch all tunables except "NMI watchdog should be turned off" to "Good"
2. suspend to disk
3. resume... all good
4. switch "NMI watchdog should be turned off" to "Good"
5. suspend to disk
6. resume... all good
7. start powertop, toggle "Wireless Power Saving for interface wlan0" twice.
I.e., "Good" -> "Bad"; "Bad" -> "Good".
-> Boom! Unknown reason NMI. It happened right during the toggle because
it appeared in the framebuffer console (no X) right during me toggling
this.
So, it is something getting fishy *after* the watchdog gets disabled.
Something remains funny and dangling, causing it to fire an NMI because
it is an NMI watchdog (doh!)... Could it be that the watchdog_disable
fact doesn't get communicated to the image kernel somehow, or maybe
delayed?
> And if I pass nmi_watchdog=0 to the image kernel, it should be gone I
> guess.
How do you pass options the image kernel?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-31 13:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-29 20:28 Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 2c on CPU 0 Borislav Petkov
2013-01-29 21:32 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-01-30 3:42 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-30 17:27 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-01-30 17:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-30 19:43 ` Jiri Slaby
2013-01-30 20:00 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-30 20:33 ` Jiri Slaby
2013-01-30 21:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-30 22:17 ` Jiri Slaby
2013-01-30 22:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-30 23:12 ` Jiri Slaby
2013-01-30 23:47 ` Jiri Slaby
2013-01-31 0:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-31 7:09 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-31 8:14 ` Jiri Slaby
2013-01-31 13:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-31 13:10 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-02 23:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-03 14:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-03 20:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-03 20:58 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-03 21:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-03 21:15 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-14 14:39 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-14 17:17 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-02-14 19:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-15 8:54 ` Konstantin Khlebnikov
2013-02-15 9:16 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-03-04 21:50 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-03-05 0:16 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-03-05 9:42 ` Jiri Slaby
2013-03-05 9:58 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-03-05 10:01 ` Jiri Slaby
2013-03-05 10:02 ` Jeff Kirsher
2013-03-05 10:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-03-05 10:29 ` Jeff Kirsher
2013-03-05 11:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-03-05 11:33 ` Jeff Kirsher
2013-03-05 11:42 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-03-06 0:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-03-06 0:19 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-03-08 16:47 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-03-05 10:01 ` Jeff Kirsher
2013-03-05 10:04 ` Jiri Slaby
2013-03-01 12:51 ` e1000e broken after resume on x230 [was: Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 2c on CPU 0.] Jiri Slaby
2013-02-06 13:54 ` Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 2c on CPU 0 Jiri Slaby
2013-02-06 21:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-01-31 8:28 ` Jiri Slaby
2013-01-31 13:18 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2013-01-31 13:24 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-03-01 12:55 ` Jiri Slaby
2013-04-04 7:32 ` Jiri Slaby
2013-04-04 9:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-04-04 9:38 ` Jiri Slaby
2013-04-04 9:58 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-31 13:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-03 21:29 ` Jiri Slaby
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130131131805.GG4926@pd.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=khlebnikov@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).