From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754607Ab3AaPNh (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jan 2013 10:13:37 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:36606 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751818Ab3AaPNg (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jan 2013 10:13:36 -0500 Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 10:13:32 -0500 From: Aristeu Rozanski To: Tejun Heo Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, Serge Hallyn Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 8/9] devcg: refactor dev_exception_clean() Message-ID: <20130131151331.GM17632@redhat.com> References: <20130130171101.060853036@napanee.usersys.redhat.com> <20130130171102.253395279@napanee.usersys.redhat.com> <20130130204730.GF8507@mail.hallyn.com> <20130130204917.GL17632@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:50:38PM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Aristeu Rozanski > that's not > intentional. thanks for catching this > > > > Tejun, you want me to resubmit the whole series or just the next patch > > (where I was supposed to move that chunk)? > > If it doesn't affect the next patch, just posting an updated version > of this patch should be enough, I think. Which tree are these patches > planned to go through? the fix should actually happen on the next patch, not this one. and it seems I'll have to refresh it anyway (just had a glance on Serge's emails). -- Aristeu