From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754592Ab3BDMcd (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Feb 2013 07:32:33 -0500 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:34583 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752478Ab3BDMcb (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Feb 2013 07:32:31 -0500 Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2013 13:32:21 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Viresh Kumar Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org, robin.randhawa@arm.com, Steve.Bannister@arm.com, Liviu.Dudau@arm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] CPUFreq: Implement per policy instances of governors Message-ID: <20130204123221.GA22340@pd.tnic> Mail-Followup-To: Borislav Petkov , Viresh Kumar , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org, robin.randhawa@arm.com, Steve.Bannister@arm.com, Liviu.Dudau@arm.com References: <5808458.pvV2iHpBWm@vostro.rjw.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 05:54:18PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > One important point i would like to highlight is: governors directory > would be present in cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/ now instead of cpu/cpufreq/. Uh, hold on, isn't this breaking a bunch of userspace with this move? Also, on all those other systems which don't need per-policy governors, we probably don't need this. So maybe this should be made optional, to be enabled by a config option IMO... Thanks. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. --