linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
To: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
	Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>,
	Aaron Durbin <adurbin@google.com>,
	Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] eventfd: introduce eventfd_signal_hangup()
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 10:28:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130205082820.GA22220@shutemov.name> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51107F42.1090401@huawei.com>

On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 11:40:50AM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> On 2013/2/4 18:15, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 05:58:58PM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> >> On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 02:50:44PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> >>> When an eventfd is closed, a wakeup with POLLHUP will be issued,
> >>> but cgroup wants to issue wakeup explicitly, so when a cgroup is
> >>> removed userspace can be notified.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
> > 
> > Hm.. Looks like it will break eventfd semantics:
> > 
> > 1. One eventfd can be used for deliver more then one notification from
> > one or more cgroups. POLLHUP on removing one of cgroups is not valid.
> > 
> > 2. It's valid to have eventfd opened only by one userspace application. We
> > should not close it, just because cgroup is removed.
> > 
> > I think problem with multiple threads waiting an event on eventfd should
> > be handled in userspace.
> > 
> 
> I didn't realize this.. and if a cgroup is removed, the woken thread may not
> be the thread that is waiting on this cgroup.

Why? The only threads who read() or poll() the eventfd will be wake up,
won't they? Do you have a code sample to demonstrate the issue?

> How crappy.. I don't know how
> userspace is going to deal with all these.
> 
> And another bug spotted. We can pass fd of memory.usage_in_bytes of cgroup A
> to cgroup.event_control of cgroup B, and then we won't get memory usage
> notification from A but B! What's worse, if A and B are in different mount
> hierarchy, boom!

I think we can ignore which cgroup event_control is belong to, and just
use cgroup of cfile as base. It also means you can use one event_control fd
for registering events to different cgroups. It can be handy.

> Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
> ---
>  kernel/cgroup.c | 11 +++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c
> index 3d21adf..e496359 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
> @@ -3825,6 +3825,7 @@ static int cgroup_write_event_control(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cftype *cft,
>  				      const char *buffer)
>  {
>  	struct cgroup_event *event = NULL;
> +	struct cgroup *cgrp_cfile;
>  	unsigned int efd, cfd;
>  	struct file *efile = NULL;
>  	struct file *cfile = NULL;
> @@ -3880,6 +3881,16 @@ static int cgroup_write_event_control(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cftype *cft,
>  		goto fail;
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * The file to be monitored must be in the same cgroup as
> +	 * cgroup.event_control is.
> +	 */
> +	cgrp_cfile = __d_cgrp(cfile->f_dentry->d_parent);
> +	if (cgrp_cfile != cgrp) {
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		goto fail;
> +	}
> +
>  	if (!event->cft->register_event || !event->cft->unregister_event) {
>  		ret = -EINVAL;
>  		goto fail;
> -- 
> 1.8.0.2
> 
> 

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov

  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-05  8:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-02  6:50 [PATCH 0/4] cgroup: bug fixes for eventfd Li Zefan
2013-02-02  6:50 ` [PATCH 1/4] eventfd: introduce eventfd_signal_hangup() Li Zefan
2013-02-02 15:58   ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2013-02-04 10:15     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2013-02-05  3:40       ` Li Zefan
2013-02-05  8:28         ` Kirill A. Shutemov [this message]
2013-02-06  1:48           ` Li Zefan
2013-02-06 14:53             ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2013-02-02  6:51 ` [PATCH 2/4] cgroup: fix cgroup_rmdir() vs close(eventfd) race Li Zefan
2013-02-02 15:59   ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2013-02-02  6:51 ` [PATCH 3/4] eventfd: make operations on eventfd return -EIDRM if it's hung up Li Zefan
2013-02-02 16:12   ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2013-02-04  3:15     ` Li Zefan
2013-02-02  6:51 ` [PATCH 4/4] cgroup: adapt to the new way of detecting cgroup removal Li Zefan
2013-02-02  6:59 ` [PATCH 0/4] cgroup: bug fixes for eventfd Li Zefan
2013-02-04 19:27 ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130205082820.GA22220@shutemov.name \
    --to=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=adurbin@google.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
    --cc=gthelen@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).