public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org,
	robin.randhawa@arm.com, Steve.Bannister@arm.com,
	Liviu.Dudau@arm.com,
	Charles Garcia-Tobin <Charles.Garcia-Tobin@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] CPUFreq: Implement per policy instances of governors
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 14:22:42 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130205132241.GH4827@pd.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKohpo=ABkc3ku=YrS7=Df_65s3OPg+eAa80gCEkiK4dNc+x4g@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 05:54:57PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:q
> This indication isn't enough. On a single image solution, we need to
> identify the system which needs support for multiple policies and i
> still feel we need that variable type indication :)

If the image is going to run also on systems which support only a
single policy, then I guess you can make it a bool, stuff it in struct
cpufreq_policy and ifdef around it.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--

  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-05 13:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-04 11:38 [PATCH 0/4] CPUFreq: Implement per policy instances of governors Viresh Kumar
2013-02-04 11:38 ` [PATCH 1/4] cpufreq: Don't check cpu_online(policy->cpu) Viresh Kumar
2013-02-04 11:38 ` [PATCH 2/4] cpufreq: stats: Get rid of CPUFREQ_STATDEVICE_ATTR Viresh Kumar
2013-02-04 11:38 ` [PATCH 3/4] cpufreq: Add per policy governor-init/exit infrastructure Viresh Kumar
2013-02-04 11:38 ` [PATCH 4/4] cpufreq: governor: Implement per policy instances of governors Viresh Kumar
2013-02-10 21:14   ` Francesco Lavra
2013-02-11  4:16     ` Viresh Kumar
2013-02-11  4:39       ` Viresh Kumar
2013-02-04 12:17 ` [PATCH 0/4] CPUFreq: " Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-04 12:24   ` Viresh Kumar
2013-02-04 12:32     ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-04 12:54       ` Viresh Kumar
2013-02-04 13:04         ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-04 13:25           ` Viresh Kumar
2013-02-04 13:36             ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-04 13:58               ` Viresh Kumar
2013-02-04 14:09                 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-04 14:21                   ` Viresh Kumar
2013-02-04 15:05                     ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-04 15:37                       ` Viresh Kumar
2013-02-04 16:50                         ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-05  7:20                           ` Viresh Kumar
2013-02-05  9:15                             ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-05  9:47                               ` Viresh Kumar
2013-02-05 10:27                                 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-05 10:43                                   ` Viresh Kumar
2013-02-05 11:04                                     ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-05 11:12                                       ` Viresh Kumar
2013-02-05 11:19                                         ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-05 11:26                                           ` Viresh Kumar
2013-02-05 11:32                                             ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-05 12:24                                               ` Viresh Kumar
2013-02-05 13:22                                                 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2013-02-05 13:55                                                   ` Viresh Kumar
2013-02-05  9:36               ` Viresh Kumar
2013-02-05 11:29                 ` Charles Garcia-Tobin
2013-02-05 11:39                   ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-05 18:38                     ` Charles Garcia-Tobin
2013-02-05 18:44                       ` Borislav Petkov
2013-02-05 16:21 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-02-06  9:58   ` Viresh Kumar
2013-02-06 10:08     ` Amit Kucheria
2013-02-06 10:15       ` Viresh Kumar
2013-02-06 10:38         ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130205132241.GH4827@pd.tnic \
    --to=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=Charles.Garcia-Tobin@arm.com \
    --cc=Liviu.Dudau@arm.com \
    --cc=Steve.Bannister@arm.com \
    --cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=robin.randhawa@arm.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox