Re: [PATCH 01/13] workqueue: remove WORK_CPU_NONE

Tejun Heo
2013-02-04T19:49:49Z

Hello, Lai.

On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 02:41:24AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> In __next_wq_cpu() for_each_*wq_cpu(), the name WORK_CPU_LAST
> is proper than WORK_CPU_NONE, convert them to WORK_CPU_LAST.
>
> WORK_CPU_NONE is not used any more, just remove it.
...
> #define for_each_wq_cpu(cpu) \
> for ((cpu) = __next_wq_cpu(-1, cpu_possible_mask, 3); \
> - (cpu) < WORK_CPU_NONE; \
> + (cpu) < WORK_CPU_LAST; \
> (cpu) = __next_wq_cpu((cpu), cpu_possible_mask, 3))

LAST implies that it's the last element of the range and thus that
it's an inclusive range. Maybe we should rename it to WORK_CPU_END?

Thanks.

--
tejun