public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
To: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] introduce static_vm for ARM-specific static mapped area
Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 11:09:42 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130206020942.GD4325@lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5110CA8E.5020606@ti.com>

Hello, Santosh.

On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 02:32:06PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 February 2013 06:01 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> >In current implementation, we used ARM-specific flag, that is,
> >VM_ARM_STATIC_MAPPING, for distinguishing ARM specific static mapped area.
> >The purpose of static mapped area is to re-use static mapped area when
> >entire physical address range of the ioremap request can be covered
> >by this area.
> >
> >This implementation causes needless overhead for some cases.
> >For example, assume that there is only one static mapped area and
> >vmlist has 300 areas. Every time we call ioremap, we check 300 areas for
> >deciding whether it is matched or not. Moreover, even if there is
> >no static mapped area and vmlist has 300 areas, every time we call
> >ioremap, we check 300 areas in now.
> >
> >If we construct a extra list for static mapped area, we can eliminate
> >above mentioned overhead.
> >With a extra list, if there is one static mapped area,
> >we just check only one area and proceed next operation quickly.
> >
> >In fact, it is not a critical problem, because ioremap is not frequently
> >used. But reducing overhead is better idea.
> >
> >Another reason for doing this work is for removing vm_struct list management,
> >entirely. For more information, look at the following link.
> >http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/6/184
> >
> 
> [..]
> 
> >
> >Joonsoo Kim (3):
> >   ARM: vmregion: remove vmregion code entirely
> >   ARM: ioremap: introduce an infrastructure for static mapped area
> >   ARM: mm: use static_vm for managing static mapped areas
> >
> >  arch/arm/mm/Makefile   |    2 +-
> >  arch/arm/mm/ioremap.c  |  135 +++++++++++++++++++++----------
> >  arch/arm/mm/mm.h       |   12 +++
> >  arch/arm/mm/mmu.c      |   34 ++++----
> >  arch/arm/mm/vmregion.c |  205 ------------------------------------------------
> >  arch/arm/mm/vmregion.h |   31 --------
> >  6 files changed, 123 insertions(+), 296 deletions(-)
> >  delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mm/vmregion.c
> >  delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mm/vmregion.h
> >
> Nice Clean-up. I tested this series on OMAP which uses few static
> mappings. Feel free to add,
> 
> Tested-by: Santosh Shilimkar<santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>

I will re-send v6 with your Tested-by.

Thanks for testing this.

> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

      reply	other threads:[~2013-02-06  2:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-05  0:31 [PATCH v5 0/3] introduce static_vm for ARM-specific static mapped area Joonsoo Kim
2013-02-05  0:31 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] ARM: vmregion: remove vmregion code entirely Joonsoo Kim
2013-02-05  8:52   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-06  2:08     ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-02-05  0:31 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] ARM: ioremap: introduce an infrastructure for static mapped area Joonsoo Kim
2013-02-05  4:08   ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-05  0:31 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] ARM: mm: use static_vm for managing static mapped areas Joonsoo Kim
2013-02-05  4:44   ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-05 17:28     ` Rob Herring
2013-02-05 18:13       ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-05 19:12         ` Rob Herring
2013-02-06  2:07           ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-02-06  5:05             ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-02-06  6:19               ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-06  1:41     ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-02-05  9:02 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] introduce static_vm for ARM-specific static mapped area Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-06  2:09   ` Joonsoo Kim [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130206020942.GD4325@lge.com \
    --to=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=nico@linaro.org \
    --cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox