From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759312Ab3BGSSZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Feb 2013 13:18:25 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:40201 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758789Ab3BGSSX (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Feb 2013 13:18:23 -0500 Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 19:17:06 +0100 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Andrey Vagin Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, criu@openvz.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Viro , "Paul E. McKenney" , David Howells , Thomas Gleixner , Michael Kerrisk , Pavel Emelyanov , Cyrill Gorcunov Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] signalfd: add ability to choose a private or shared queue Message-ID: <20130207181706.GA8780@redhat.com> References: <1358849741-9611-1-git-send-email-avagin@openvz.org> <1358849741-9611-3-git-send-email-avagin@openvz.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1358849741-9611-3-git-send-email-avagin@openvz.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org AOn 01/22, Andrey Vagin wrote: > > This patch is added two flags SFD_SHARED_QUEUE and SFD_PER_THREAD_QUEUE > SFD_SHARED_QUEUE I can't believe I am going to blame the naming ;) but these 2 do not look "symmetrical".... SFD_PRIVATE_QUEUE looks a little bit better to me. At least it is simpler to type. But I am fine either way. Oleg.