From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH wq/for-3.9] workqueue: pick cwq instead of pool in __queue_work()
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 13:13:06 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130207211306.GV2875@htj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1359657696-2767-8-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Currently, __queue_work() chooses the pool to queue a work item to and
then determines cwq from the target wq and the chosen pool. This is a
bit backwards in that we can determine cwq first and simply use
cwq->pool. This way, we can skip get_std_worker_pool() in queueing
path which will be a hurdle when implementing custom worker pools.
Update __queue_work() such that it chooses the target cwq and then use
cwq->pool instead of the other way around. While at it, add missing
{} in an if statement.
This patch doesn't introduce any functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 29 +++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -1193,8 +1193,6 @@ static bool is_chained_work(struct workq
static void __queue_work(unsigned int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
struct work_struct *work)
{
- bool highpri = wq->flags & WQ_HIGHPRI;
- struct worker_pool *pool;
struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq;
struct list_head *worklist;
unsigned int work_flags;
@@ -1215,7 +1213,7 @@ static void __queue_work(unsigned int cp
WARN_ON_ONCE(!is_chained_work(wq)))
return;
- /* determine pool to use */
+ /* determine the cwq to use */
if (!(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND)) {
struct worker_pool *last_pool;
@@ -1228,37 +1226,36 @@ static void __queue_work(unsigned int cp
* work needs to be queued on that cpu to guarantee
* non-reentrancy.
*/
- pool = get_std_worker_pool(cpu, highpri);
+ cwq = get_cwq(cpu, wq);
last_pool = get_work_pool(work);
- if (last_pool && last_pool != pool) {
+ if (last_pool && last_pool != cwq->pool) {
struct worker *worker;
spin_lock(&last_pool->lock);
worker = find_worker_executing_work(last_pool, work);
- if (worker && worker->current_cwq->wq == wq)
- pool = last_pool;
- else {
+ if (worker && worker->current_cwq->wq == wq) {
+ cwq = get_cwq(last_pool->cpu, wq);
+ } else {
/* meh... not running there, queue here */
spin_unlock(&last_pool->lock);
- spin_lock(&pool->lock);
+ spin_lock(&cwq->pool->lock);
}
} else {
- spin_lock(&pool->lock);
+ spin_lock(&cwq->pool->lock);
}
} else {
- pool = get_std_worker_pool(WORK_CPU_UNBOUND, highpri);
- spin_lock(&pool->lock);
+ cwq = get_cwq(WORK_CPU_UNBOUND, wq);
+ spin_lock(&cwq->pool->lock);
}
- /* pool determined, get cwq and queue */
- cwq = get_cwq(pool->cpu, wq);
+ /* cwq determined, queue */
trace_workqueue_queue_work(req_cpu, cwq, work);
if (WARN_ON(!list_empty(&work->entry))) {
- spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
+ spin_unlock(&cwq->pool->lock);
return;
}
@@ -1276,7 +1273,7 @@ static void __queue_work(unsigned int cp
insert_work(cwq, work, worklist, work_flags);
- spin_unlock(&pool->lock);
+ spin_unlock(&cwq->pool->lock);
}
/**
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-07 21:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-31 18:41 [PATCH 00/13] workqueue: enhance locking and record global worker id for work data Lai Jiangshan
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 01/13] workqueue: remove WORK_CPU_NONE Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-04 19:49 ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-05 12:03 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-06 22:34 ` [PATCH wq/for-3.9] workqueue: replace WORK_CPU_NONE/LAST with WORK_CPU_END Tejun Heo
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 02/13] workqueue: fix work_busy() Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-04 19:54 ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-05 12:06 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-05 18:53 ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-06 11:42 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-06 14:05 ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-06 23:02 ` [PATCH wq/for-3.9] workqueue: make work_busy() test WORK_STRUCT_PENDING first Tejun Heo
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 03/13] workqueue: don't set work cwq until we queued it on pool Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-04 21:28 ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-05 15:00 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-05 16:45 ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-06 11:35 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-06 14:18 ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-05 15:06 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-07 0:28 ` [PATCH wq/for-3.9 workqueue]: add delayed_work->wq to simplify reentrancy handling Tejun Heo
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 04/13] workqueue: clear cwq when cancel the work Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-07 0:53 ` [PATCH wq/for-3.9] workqueue: make work->data point to pool after try_to_grab_pending() Tejun Heo
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 05/13] workqueue: change queued detection and remove *mb()s Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-07 1:52 ` [PATCH wq/for-3.9] workqueue: simplify is-work-item-queued-here test Tejun Heo
2013-02-07 2:03 ` [PATCH wq/for-3.9] workqueue: cosmetic update in try_to_grab_pending() Tejun Heo
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 06/13] workqueue: get pool id from work->data directly if it is offq Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-07 20:16 ` [PATCH wq/for-3.9] workqueue: make get_work_pool_id() cheaper Tejun Heo
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 07/13] workqueue: get pool from wq/cwq Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-07 21:13 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 08/13] workqueue: add lock_pool_executing_work() Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-04 21:34 ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-05 12:15 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-05 19:09 ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 09/13] workqueue: add lock_pool_queued_work() Lai Jiangshan
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 10/13] workqueue: add lock_pool_own_work() and remove get_work_pool() Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-04 21:38 ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 11/13] workqueue: allow more work_pool id space Lai Jiangshan
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 12/13] workqueue: add worker's global worker ID Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-04 21:39 ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-31 18:41 ` [PATCH 13/13] workqueue: record global worker ID instead of pool ID in work->data when off-queue Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-04 21:40 ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-04 22:12 ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-05 15:18 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-07 22:02 ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-13 22:23 ` Tejun Heo
2013-02-04 21:04 ` [PATCH 00/13] workqueue: enhance locking and record global worker id for work data Tejun Heo
2013-02-05 16:19 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-02-05 16:50 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130207211306.GV2875@htj.dyndns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox