From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] scheduler include file reorganization
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 10:54:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130211095457.GF23932@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130208085828.02e61518@riff.lan>
* Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com> wrote:
> I figured that was coming. :)
;-)
> I'll look at it again and see about pulling the
> autogroup/cgroup stuff into it's own header. After that it's
> probably going to require some serious changes.
>
> Any suggestions?
I'd suggest doing it as finegrained as possible - potentially
one concept at a time. I wouldn't mind a dozen small files in
include/linux/sched/ - possibly more.
In the end sched.h would include core wakeup/sleep methods that
tons of drivers rely on, and it would include the 'struct
task_struct' data type definition (and all its prereqs), which
we rely on in tons of drivers as well.
Not much else should remain in sched.h - in theory :-)
In terms of build coverage: just build an x86 defconfig with
perhaps the specific sub-feature (such as autogroups/cgroups)
turned off/on - I'd suggest for you to not even do allmodconfig
testing (which is really slow unless you have a cluster of build
machines), I can test all that and more and fix the fallout
before applying it.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-11 9:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-07 15:46 [PATCH 0/3] scheduler include file reorganization Clark Williams
2013-02-07 18:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-02-07 19:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-02-07 19:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-02-07 21:08 ` Clark Williams
2013-02-08 14:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-02-08 14:58 ` Clark Williams
2013-02-11 9:54 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2013-02-13 1:29 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-02-13 9:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-02-13 15:19 ` Clark Williams
2013-02-14 7:59 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-02-16 3:40 ` Li Zefan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130211095457.GF23932@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=williams@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox