From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757536Ab3BKP0v (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Feb 2013 10:26:51 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]:61813 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756758Ab3BKP0t (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Feb 2013 10:26:49 -0500 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Michal Simek Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/block/xsysace - replace in(out)_8/in(out)_be16/in(out)_le16 with generic iowrite(read)8/16(be) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 15:26:37 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/3.8.0-5-generic; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Grant Likely , Alexey Brodkin , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Vineet Gupta , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Alan Cox , dahinds@users.sourceforge.net References: <1359475380-31512-1-git-send-email-abrodkin@synopsys.com> <201302072312.45988.arnd@arndb.de> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201302111526.37892.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:r/LkcEQHbJQ+TH1NSK21oi0KjiyNJcutdp/LCIF0J0/ KfRXTfnGNXLtrTXK1Szz++hqG0g8dryT+ylxqcTUjL06m/2JP3 7K4dAXmVAOxgpq5V67AjPNW0NQ3Yt4JZn1kBVOJ8y8wnZWg8/c PdRLMNg+W0U1nTJwKbT4/sfBu0O8klsiPnntN0YFxf0Ng7fBxa qcnM1j3dY5udvm046kNJy5UqCSS75wIabOmwD5oe3VnQ4Nf8MS ha0B2ndcfODCLSkABXlpvisJ5ZvP8vFBZj5ZXic/RMe4BUnwI8 NixepZXBDdeEMrL4I7lhVT3i3TvluWndbEo0W7RnKQ3ETjhVft MDj4uFapPPvtCTKMF7dI= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 11 February 2013, Michal Simek wrote: > > 2013/2/8 Arnd Bergmann : > > On Thursday 07 February 2013, Michal Simek wrote: > >> Subject: "asm-generic: io: Fix ioread16/32be and iowrite16/32be" > > > > Ok, thanks. If you don't mind, I think this can just go with the other patches > > for xsysace that come out of this discussion. > > I want to move microblaze to use this asm-generic/io.h that's why I > prefer to send > this with microblaze patch directly to Linus. For me this make more sense that > with sending block device driver changes. > > What do you think? Sure, please do it that way. My policy for asm-generic patches is that they I prefer to have them go through whatever tree needs them, I was just confused about which one that would be in this case. Arnd