From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Lior Amsalem <alior@marvell.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
"Russell King - ARM Linux" <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>,
"Eran Ben-Avi" <benavi@marvell.com>,
Nadav Haklai <nadavh@marvell.com>,
Maen Suleiman <maen@marvell.com>,
Shadi Ammouri <shadi@marvell.com>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>,
Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik@marvell.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/32] lib: devres: don't enclose pcim_*() functions in CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 19:58:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130212195816.6e34b3ce@skate> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201302121800.48723.arnd@arndb.de>
Dear Arnd Bergmann,
On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 18:00:48 +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 February 2013, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> > The pcim_*() functions are used by the libata-sff subsystem, and
> > this subsystem is used for many SATA drivers on ARM platforms that
> > do not necessarily have I/O ports.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni
> > <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> Cc: Paul Gortmaker
> > <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Cc: Jesse Barnes
> > <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
> > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>
> Sorry, but this patch is still incorrect.
I know, but the discussion was so huge on the first posting that it was
basically impossible to draw a conclusion out of it.
> Any driver that requires a
> linear mapping of I/O ports to __iomem pointers must depend
> CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT with the current definition of that symbol (as
> mentioned before, we should really rename that to
> CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT_MAP). Having these functions not defined is a
> compile time check that is necessary to ensure that all drivers have
> the correct annotation.
I have the feeling that the problem is more complex than that. My
understanding is that the pcim_iomap_regions() function used by
drivers/ata/libata-sff.c can perfectly be used to map memory BARs, and
not necessarily I/O BARs. Therefore, this driver can perfectly be used
in an architecture where CONFIG_NO_IOPORT is selected.
The thing is that pcim_iomap_regions() transparently allows to remap an
I/O BAR is such a BAR is passed as argument, or a memory BAR if such a
BAR is passed as argument.
Therefore, I continue to believe that the pcim_*() functions are useful
even if the platform doesn't have CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT.
Best regards,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-12 18:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1360686546-24277-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
2013-02-12 16:28 ` [PATCH 05/32] lib: devres: don't enclose pcim_*() functions in CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT Thomas Petazzoni
2013-02-12 18:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-02-12 18:58 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2013-02-12 22:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-03-04 16:28 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-03-04 20:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-03-06 6:28 Jingoo Han
2013-03-06 8:26 ` Thomas Petazzoni
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-03-06 8:40 Jingoo Han
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130212195816.6e34b3ce@skate \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=alior@marvell.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=benavi@marvell.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=gregory.clement@free-electrons.com \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=maen@marvell.com \
--cc=nadavh@marvell.com \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=shadi@marvell.com \
--cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=tawfik@marvell.com \
--cc=thierry.reding@avionic-design.de \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox