From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@linaro.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, rusty@rustcorp.com.au,
hpa@linux.intel.com, jim.cromie@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com,
Patch Tracking <patches@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver core: add wait event for deferred probe
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 17:42:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130214174240.810203E12FB@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201302141557.18308.arnd@arndb.de>
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 15:57:18 +0000, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> On Thursday 14 February 2013, Haojian Zhuang wrote:
> > If you can change it into code in below, it could work. Otherwise, it
> > always fails.
> > driver_deferred_probe_enable = true;
> > driver_deferred_probe_trigger();
> > + deferred_probe_work_func(NULL);
> > return 0;
> >
> > Because deferred_probe_work_func() depends on that deferred_probe is added
> > into deferred_probe_active_list. If driver_deferred_probe_trigger() isn't called
> > first, the deferred uart probe can't be added into active list. So even you call
> > work_func at here, it doesn't help.
> >
>
> Would that not cause two instances of the work function to run at the same time?
> That sounds like a source for a lot of problems.
Yes. Even ignoring the problems with device drivers not handling
multithreaded probing well, the current deferred probe wouldn't handle
it well. I could make it support multithreading, but I don't see a whole
lot of value there.
g.
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc, P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies, Ltd.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-14 17:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-09 16:57 [PATCH] driver core: add wait event for deferred probe Haojian Zhuang
2013-02-11 23:10 ` Andrew Morton
2013-02-12 2:52 ` Haojian Zhuang
2013-02-13 21:36 ` Grant Likely
2013-02-14 3:27 ` anish singh
2013-02-14 9:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-02-14 10:04 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-14 11:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-02-14 16:33 ` Grant Likely
2013-02-14 17:42 ` anish kumar
2013-02-14 15:52 ` Haojian Zhuang
2013-02-14 15:57 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-02-14 16:04 ` Haojian Zhuang
2013-02-14 16:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-02-14 16:58 ` Haojian Zhuang
2013-02-14 17:54 ` Grant Likely
2013-02-14 17:42 ` Grant Likely [this message]
2013-02-14 17:38 ` Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130214174240.810203E12FB@localhost \
--to=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=haojian.zhuang@linaro.org \
--cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jim.cromie@gmail.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox