From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: make PTRACE_GETREGSET return 32-bit regs if 64-bit process entered kernel with int 80
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 00:55:21 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130214205521.GA20085@moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <511D3928.80402@zytor.com>
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:21:12AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 02/14/2013 11:18 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > On 02/14, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >>
> >> On 02/14/2013 07:00 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >>> On 02/14, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Determining personality of a ptraced process is a murky area.
> >>>> On x86, for years strace was looking at segment selectors,
> >>>> which is conceptually wrong: see, for example,
> >>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/1/18/320
> >>>>
> >>
> >> One proposal that keeps being on the table is to export a regset with
> >> metadatam, including process mode at launch (i386, x86-64, x32).
> >
> > Yes... but if this metadata includes TS_COMPAT-is-set, then strace should
> > do PTRACE_GETREGSET(REGSET_META) + PTRACE_GETREGSET(REGSET_GENERAL) every
> > time. Or REGSET_META should include META+GENERAL.
> >
> > IOW, it is not clear to me what this "meta" should actually report.
>
> That is one of the things that needs to be nailed down. In particular,
> what are the things people need.
Indeed, having some "official" way for compat bit retrieval would be
a great thing for us (c/r camp) since we've just met the same problem.
And at moment I sticked for the same trick as gdb does (cs/ds test).
But, guys, if only I'm not missing something completely obvious,
can't we simply provide task-compat bit to userspace in say /proc/pid/stat
or something? Then the strace/gdb would be able to always know if
the tracee is actually in compat mode. Or I miss something fundamental
here?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-14 20:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-14 13:17 [PATCH] x86: make PTRACE_GETREGSET return 32-bit regs if 64-bit process entered kernel with int 80 Denys Vlasenko
2013-02-14 15:00 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-14 16:26 ` Denys Vlasenko
2013-02-14 18:05 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-02-14 19:18 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-14 19:21 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-02-14 20:55 ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
2013-02-15 14:50 ` Denys Vlasenko
2013-02-15 14:56 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2013-02-15 15:09 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-15 15:16 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2013-02-15 15:42 ` Denys Vlasenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130214205521.GA20085@moon \
--to=gorcunov@openvz.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=xemul@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox