From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "Kasatkin, Dmitry" <dmitry.kasatkin@intel.com>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ima: Support appraise_type=imasig_optional
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 13:21:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130218182114.GB25922@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1360855815.3524.615.camel@falcor1.watson.ibm.com>
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:30:15AM -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 10:03 -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 05:27:01PM -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> >
> > [..]
> > > > Yep, I got that. Default policy gets overruled when a new policy is
> > > > loaded.
> > > >
> > > > In secureboot mode, somehow above rule needs to take effect by default.
> > > > One option would be that kernel can enforce above rule.
> > > > (I guess by adding it to both default_list as well as policy list).
> > >
> > > The default policy is empty, but can be replaced with boot command line
> > > options. The existing options are ima_tcb and/ ima_appraise_tcb.
> > > Please feel free to define an additional policy.
> >
> > I think just defining a new command line option is not sufficient
> > for secureboot use case.
> >
> > - One can easily remove kernel command line option without breaking
> > booting and easily bypass secureboot restrictions.
>
> > - I guess this is one mandated rule by secureboot. There might still
> > be a user policy which can co-exist with this rule.
> >
> > So to me this is not a new policy. It is just one mandatory rule which
> > gets appended to any policy in secureboot mode. Think of it as mandatory
> > rule imposed by kernel for any policy user can define. And in secureboot
> > mode a user can not get rid of this rule. (Otherwise it breaks user
> > space signing and one can bypass secureboot and boot into unsigned
> > kernel).
>
> Your rule allows both signed and unsigned files to be executed. Signed
> files will just have more capabilities. The ima_appraise_tcb option
> requires all files owned by root to be signed, otherwise access is
> denied. The two policies simply can not co-exist.
Thinking loud. I guess we might have to extend ima policy/rules to allow
multiple appraise rules to co-exist. And access permission will finally
depend on if all the rules in same category return success.
Thanks
Vivek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-18 18:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-11 20:11 [RFC PATCH 0/2] ima: Support a mode to appraise signed files only Vivek Goyal
2013-02-11 20:11 ` [PATCH 1/2] ima: Do not try to fix hash if file system does not support security xattr Vivek Goyal
2013-02-12 11:45 ` Mimi Zohar
2013-02-12 14:27 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-02-11 20:11 ` [PATCH 2/2] ima: Support appraise_type=imasig_optional Vivek Goyal
2013-02-11 22:10 ` Mimi Zohar
2013-02-12 14:26 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-02-12 17:14 ` Mimi Zohar
2013-02-12 18:52 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-02-12 18:57 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-02-13 12:14 ` Kasatkin, Dmitry
2013-02-13 13:29 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-02-13 13:36 ` Kasatkin, Dmitry
2013-02-13 13:49 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-02-13 14:03 ` Mimi Zohar
2013-02-13 14:38 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-02-13 15:26 ` Kasatkin, Dmitry
2013-02-13 15:29 ` Kasatkin, Dmitry
2013-02-13 15:39 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-02-13 15:30 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-02-13 22:27 ` Mimi Zohar
2013-02-14 15:03 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-02-14 15:30 ` Mimi Zohar
2013-02-18 18:21 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2013-02-19 21:54 ` Mimi Zohar
2013-02-13 15:51 ` Mimi Zohar
2013-02-12 20:05 ` Mimi Zohar
2013-02-13 12:31 ` Kasatkin, Dmitry
2013-02-13 12:56 ` Mimi Zohar
2013-02-13 13:13 ` Kasatkin, Dmitry
2013-02-13 13:44 ` Mimi Zohar
2013-02-13 16:59 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-02-14 12:57 ` Mimi Zohar
2013-02-14 15:23 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-02-14 15:35 ` Mimi Zohar
2013-02-14 16:17 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-02-14 16:31 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-02-14 19:49 ` Mimi Zohar
2013-02-14 20:54 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-02-14 20:57 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-02-14 21:54 ` Mimi Zohar
2013-02-13 17:33 ` Kasatkin, Dmitry
2013-02-13 17:51 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-02-13 18:20 ` Kasatkin, Dmitry
2013-02-13 21:45 ` Mimi Zohar
2013-02-14 14:40 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-02-14 15:48 ` Mimi Zohar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130218182114.GB25922@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=dmitry.kasatkin@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox