From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
Cc: <rob@landley.net>, <tony@atomide.com>, <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
<eballetbo@gmail.com>, <javier@dowhile0.org>, <balbi@ti.com>,
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
<mchehab@redhat.com>, <cesarb@cesarb.net>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
<arnd@arndb.de>, <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>,
<broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>, <swarren@nvidia.com>,
<linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] drivers: phy: add generic PHY framework
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 10:01:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130219080109.GD23197@arwen.pp.htv.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1361253198-7401-2-git-send-email-kishon@ti.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4270 bytes --]
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:23:14AM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> The PHY framework provides a set of APIs for the PHY drivers to
> create/destroy a PHY and APIs for the PHY users to obtain a reference to the
> PHY with or without using phandle. To obtain a reference to the PHY without
> using phandle, the platform specfic intialization code (say from board file)
> should have already called phy_bind with the binding information. The binding
> information consists of phy's device name, phy user device name and an index.
> The index is used when the same phy user binds to mulitple phys.
>
> PHY drivers should create the PHY by passing phy_descriptor that has
> describes the PHY (label, type etc..) and ops like init, exit, suspend, resume,
s/has describes/describes
> poweron, shutdown.
>
> The documentation for the generic PHY framework is added in
> Documentation/phy.txt and the documentation for the sysfs entry is added
> in Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-phy.
you forgot to mention here that one case of re-use is OMAP5 where the
same PHY IP (different instances of it) is used for SATA and USB3
functionality, which means that we would have to maintain 2 drivers for
the same thing.
> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-phy b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-phy
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..ffd9930
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-phy
> @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
> +What: /sys/class/phy/<phy>/label
> +Date: Feb 2013
> +KernelVersion: 3.10
> +Contact: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
> +Description:
> + This is a read-only file for getting the label of the phy.
> +
> +What: /sys/class/phy/<phy>/bind
this will cause problems with the generic bind/unbind sysfs files which
are write-only. You should probably rename it to something else.
> +4. Getting a reference to the PHY
> +
> +Before the controller can make use of the PHY, it has to get a reference to
> +the PHY. The PHY framework provides 4 APIs to get a reference to the PHY.
'it has to get a reference to it. This framework', decreases the
duplication of 'PHY'.
> +struct phy *phy_get(struct device *dev, u8 index);
> +struct phy *devm_phy_get(struct device *dev, u8 index);
> +struct phy *of_phy_get(struct device *dev, const char *phandle, u8 index);
> +struct phy *devm_of_phy_get(struct device *dev, const char *phandle, u8 index);
> +
> +phy_get and devm_phy_get can be used to get the PHY in non-dt boot. This API
> +uses the binding information added using the phy_bind API to find and return
> +the appropriate PHY. The only difference between the two APIs is that
> +devm_phy_get associates the device with the PHY using devres on successful PHY
> +get. On driver detach, release function is invoked on the the devres data and
s/the the/the/
> +devres data is freed.
s/devres data/it/
> +7. Current Status
> +
> +Currently only USB in OMAP is made to use this framework. However using the
> +USB PHY library cannot be completely removed because it is intertwined with
> +OTG. Once we move OTG out of PHY completely, using the old PHY library can be
> +completely removed. SATA in OMAP will also more likely use this new framework
> +and we should have a patch for it soon.
not sure if this should be in the documentation, but fair enough.
> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(phy_list_mutex);
not sure if a mutex is enough to protect list traversal...
> +struct phy_ops {
> + int (*init)(struct phy_descriptor *desc);
> + int (*exit)(struct phy_descriptor *desc);
> + int (*suspend)(struct phy_descriptor *desc);
> + int (*resume)(struct phy_descriptor *desc);
should you really have these two pointers ? I wonder if it wouldn't be
better to force runtime_pm down on the users and have phy_suspend() and
phy_resume() just be wrappers to pm_runtime_get() and pm_runtime_put().
Up to discussion, I guess.
> +#if defined(CONFIG_GENERIC_PHY) || defined(CONFIG_GENERIC_PHY_MODULE)
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_GENERIC_PHY)
> +static inline struct phy *devm_phy_get(struct device *dev, u8 index)
> +{
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
would -EOPNOTSUPP fit better here (and all others)
--
balbi
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-19 8:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-19 5:53 [PATCH v2 0/5] Generic PHY Framework Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-02-19 5:53 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] drivers: phy: add generic PHY framework Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-02-19 8:01 ` Felipe Balbi [this message]
2013-02-19 12:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-02-19 13:56 ` kishon
2013-02-19 14:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-02-23 22:44 ` Rob Landley
2013-02-25 6:41 ` kishon
2013-02-19 5:53 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] usb: phy: omap-usb2: use the new " Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-02-19 8:11 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-19 5:53 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] usb: otg: twl4030: " Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-02-19 5:53 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] ARM: OMAP: USB: Add phy binding information Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-02-19 5:53 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] usb: musb: omap2430: use the new generic PHY framework Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-02-19 10:44 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] Generic PHY Framework Arnd Bergmann
2013-02-19 11:28 ` kishon
2013-02-19 12:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-02-19 13:12 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-19 14:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-02-19 15:05 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-19 15:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-02-19 15:47 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-19 16:07 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2013-02-19 16:17 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-23 20:05 ` Rob Landley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130219080109.GD23197@arwen.pp.htv.fi \
--to=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=cesarb@cesarb.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eballetbo@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=javier@dowhile0.org \
--cc=kishon@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=mchehab@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rob@landley.net \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=swarren@nvidia.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox