public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
	"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging/sep: Fix smatch false positive about potential NULL dereference in sep_main.c
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:25:08 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130219122508.GA9138@mwanda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1361275648-6259-1-git-send-email-peterhuewe@gmx.de>

On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 01:07:27PM +0100, Peter Huewe wrote:
> Smatch complains about a potential NULL pointer dereference:
> 
> sep_main.c:2312 sep_construct_dma_tables_from_lli() error: potential
> NULL dereference 'info_out_entry_ptr'.
> 
> info_out_entry_ptr is initialized with NULL and if info_in_entry_ptr is
> not NULL it gets derefenced.
> However info_out_entry_ptr is only NULL in the first iteration of the
> while loop and in this case info_in_entry_ptr is also NULL (as indicated
> by the comment /* If info entry is null - this is the first table built */
> -> this is a false positive.
> 
> Nevertheless we add a check for info_out_entry_ptr to silence this
> warning and make it more robust in regard to code changes.
> 

Smatch doesn't handle loops very well.  Of course, all along I've
wanted to fix this, but it's a bit complicated so it could be
another year or two before it actually happens.

Generally, as a philosophy, I always say never to change the code
for false positives.  It should be Smatch which changes.

Also the other thing is that with Smatch I deliberately allow more
false positives than GCC does.  It's a trade off between being
ambitious in looking for bugs and being annoying to users.

When Smatch looks at this code it sees the else side as impossible
to reach.  Perhaps I should add a hack in that if the code is in an
impossible to reach place then don't print a warning...  It would
be better to just fix loop handling...  I'm not sure.

regards,
dan carpenter


      parent reply	other threads:[~2013-02-19 12:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-19 12:07 [PATCH 1/2] staging/sep: Fix smatch false positive about potential NULL dereference in sep_main.c Peter Huewe
2013-02-19 12:07 ` [PATCH 2/2] staging/sep: Check pointers before dereferencing (fix smatch warning) Peter Huewe
2013-02-19 12:25 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130219122508.GA9138@mwanda \
    --to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
    --cc=rpjday@crashcourse.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox