From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>, "Keir (Xen.org)" <keir@xen.org>,
"Tim (Xen.org)" <tim@xen.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH LINUX v4] xen: event channel arrays are xen_ulong_t and not unsigned long
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:43:37 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130219184337.GB18831@phenom.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1302191808110.4654@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 06:12:35PM +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Feb 2013, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On ARM we want these to be the same size on 32- and 64-bit.
> >
> > This is an ABI change on ARM. X86 does not change.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
> > Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
> > Cc: Keir (Xen.org) <keir@xen.org>
> > Cc: Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
> > Cc: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
> > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> > Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> > Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
> > ---
> > Changes since V3
> > s/read_evtchn_pending_sel/xchg_xen_ulong/ in a comment.
> > Changes since V2
> > Add comments about the correct bitops to use, and on the ordering/barrier
> > requirements on xchg_xen_ulong.
> > Changes since V1
> > use find_first_set not __ffs
> > fix some more unsigned long -> xen_ulong_t
> > use more generic xchg_xen_ulong instead of ...read_evtchn...
>
> still doesn't apply to 3.8
Weird. It applied to my tree (stable/for-linus-3.9) without fuss.
>
>
> > do {
> > - unsigned long pending_words;
> > + xen_ulong_t pending_words;
> >
> > vcpu_info->evtchn_upcall_pending = 0;
> >
> > if (__this_cpu_inc_return(xed_nesting_count) - 1)
> > goto out;
> >
> > -#ifndef CONFIG_X86 /* No need for a barrier -- XCHG is a barrier on x86. */
> > - /* Clear master flag /before/ clearing selector flag. */
> > - wmb();
> > -#endif
> > - pending_words = xchg(&vcpu_info->evtchn_pending_sel, 0);
> > + /*
> > + * Master flag must be /before/ clearing selector
> > + * flag. xchg_xen_ulong must contain an appropriate
> > + * barrier.
> > + */
>
> Master flag must be *cleared* ...
>
> > + pending_words = xchg_xen_ulong(&vcpu_info->evtchn_pending_sel, 0);
> >
> > start_word_idx = __this_cpu_read(current_word_idx);
> > start_bit_idx = __this_cpu_read(current_bit_idx);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-19 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-19 14:48 [PATCH V2] xen: event channel arrays are xen_ulong_t and not unsigned long Ian Campbell
2013-02-19 14:49 ` [PATCH LINUX] " Ian Campbell
2013-02-19 17:11 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-02-19 17:17 ` Ian Campbell
2013-02-19 17:26 ` Tim Deegan
2013-02-19 17:28 ` Ian Campbell
2013-02-19 14:49 ` [PATCH XEN] " Ian Campbell
2013-02-19 16:42 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-02-21 17:16 ` Ian Campbell
2013-02-21 18:43 ` Keir Fraser
2013-02-22 8:28 ` Ian Campbell
2013-02-22 8:12 ` Jan Beulich
2013-02-22 8:28 ` Ian Campbell
2013-02-22 8:48 ` Jan Beulich
2013-02-22 8:55 ` Ian Campbell
2013-02-22 9:05 ` Jan Beulich
2013-02-19 17:27 ` [PATCH LINUX v3] " Ian Campbell
2013-02-19 17:29 ` [PATCH LINUX v4] " Ian Campbell
2013-02-19 18:12 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-02-19 18:43 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2013-02-20 2:07 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-02-20 3:09 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-02-20 9:13 ` Ian Campbell
2013-02-20 11:48 ` [PATCH LINUX v5] " Ian Campbell
2013-02-21 17:11 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-03-04 2:45 ` Rob Herring
2013-03-05 3:04 ` Will Deacon
2013-03-05 3:45 ` Ian Campbell
2013-03-05 6:55 ` Rob Herring
2013-03-05 7:03 ` Ian Campbell
2013-03-05 8:08 ` Will Deacon
2013-03-05 9:29 ` Ian Campbell
2013-03-07 3:17 ` Will Deacon
2013-03-07 7:17 ` Ian Campbell
2013-03-05 3:56 ` Ian Campbell
2013-03-05 14:04 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130219184337.GB18831@phenom.dumpdata.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=keir@xen.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
--cc=tim@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox