public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xen.org" <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>, "Keir (Xen.org)" <keir@xen.org>,
	"Tim (Xen.org)" <tim@xen.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH LINUX v4] xen: event channel arrays are xen_ulong_t and not unsigned long
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:43:37 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130219184337.GB18831@phenom.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1302191808110.4654@kaball.uk.xensource.com>

On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 06:12:35PM +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Feb 2013, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On ARM we want these to be the same size on 32- and 64-bit.
> > 
> > This is an ABI change on ARM. X86 does not change.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
> > Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
> > Cc: Keir (Xen.org) <keir@xen.org>
> > Cc: Tim Deegan <tim@xen.org>
> > Cc: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
> > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> > Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> > Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
> > ---
> > Changes since V3
> >   s/read_evtchn_pending_sel/xchg_xen_ulong/ in a comment.
> > Changes since V2
> >   Add comments about the correct bitops to use, and on the ordering/barrier
> >   requirements on xchg_xen_ulong.
> > Changes since V1
> >   use find_first_set not __ffs
> >   fix some more unsigned long -> xen_ulong_t
> >   use more generic xchg_xen_ulong instead of ...read_evtchn...
> 
> still doesn't apply to 3.8

Weird. It applied to my tree (stable/for-linus-3.9) without fuss.
> 
> 
> >         do {
> > -               unsigned long pending_words;
> > +               xen_ulong_t pending_words;
> > 
> >                 vcpu_info->evtchn_upcall_pending = 0;
> > 
> >                 if (__this_cpu_inc_return(xed_nesting_count) - 1)
> >                         goto out;
> > 
> > -#ifndef CONFIG_X86 /* No need for a barrier -- XCHG is a barrier on x86. */
> > -               /* Clear master flag /before/ clearing selector flag. */
> > -               wmb();
> > -#endif
> > -               pending_words = xchg(&vcpu_info->evtchn_pending_sel, 0);
> > +               /*
> > +                * Master flag must be /before/ clearing selector
> > +                * flag. xchg_xen_ulong must contain an appropriate
> > +                * barrier.
> > +                */
> 
> Master flag must be *cleared* ...
> 
> > +               pending_words = xchg_xen_ulong(&vcpu_info->evtchn_pending_sel, 0);
> > 
> >                 start_word_idx = __this_cpu_read(current_word_idx);
> >                 start_bit_idx = __this_cpu_read(current_bit_idx);

  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-19 18:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-19 14:48 [PATCH V2] xen: event channel arrays are xen_ulong_t and not unsigned long Ian Campbell
2013-02-19 14:49 ` [PATCH LINUX] " Ian Campbell
2013-02-19 17:11   ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-02-19 17:17     ` Ian Campbell
2013-02-19 17:26       ` Tim Deegan
2013-02-19 17:28         ` Ian Campbell
2013-02-19 14:49 ` [PATCH XEN] " Ian Campbell
2013-02-19 16:42   ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-02-21 17:16   ` Ian Campbell
2013-02-21 18:43     ` Keir Fraser
2013-02-22  8:28       ` Ian Campbell
2013-02-22  8:12     ` Jan Beulich
2013-02-22  8:28       ` Ian Campbell
2013-02-22  8:48         ` Jan Beulich
2013-02-22  8:55           ` Ian Campbell
2013-02-22  9:05             ` Jan Beulich
2013-02-19 17:27 ` [PATCH LINUX v3] " Ian Campbell
2013-02-19 17:29 ` [PATCH LINUX v4] " Ian Campbell
2013-02-19 18:12   ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-02-19 18:43     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2013-02-20  2:07   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-02-20  3:09     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-02-20  9:13       ` Ian Campbell
2013-02-20 11:48 ` [PATCH LINUX v5] " Ian Campbell
2013-02-21 17:11   ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-03-04  2:45   ` Rob Herring
2013-03-05  3:04     ` Will Deacon
2013-03-05  3:45       ` Ian Campbell
2013-03-05  6:55       ` Rob Herring
2013-03-05  7:03         ` Ian Campbell
2013-03-05  8:08         ` Will Deacon
2013-03-05  9:29           ` Ian Campbell
2013-03-07  3:17             ` Will Deacon
2013-03-07  7:17               ` Ian Campbell
2013-03-05  3:56     ` Ian Campbell
2013-03-05 14:04       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130219184337.GB18831@phenom.dumpdata.com \
    --to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=keir@xen.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=tim@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox