From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@chromium.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ben Chan <benchan@chromium.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] coredump: ignore non-fatal signals when core dumping to a pipe
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:45:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130219194517.GA9986@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACBanvq+Sdtv-tNXTmJyb3EvXGshC=D4NjR8aVOCjRXcTKp+Mw@mail.gmail.com>
On 02/19, Mandeep Singh Baines wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 6:27 AM, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Please look at 1-3 I sent. Btw, I slightly tested this series, seems
> > to work...
> >
>
> They look good to me. I plan on applying them to our tree since we
> need a fix ASAP.
Great!
> >> You'd need to prevent the fake signal from freeezer from setting
> >> TIF_SIGPENDING. Maybe just add a SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT check in freezer.c.
> >
> > I am thinking about checking SIGNAL_GROUP_COREDUMP but I am not sure,
> > perhaps we can make a simpler solution. As for wait_for_dump_helper()
> > we do not need any check at all, but we should either fix
> > wait_event_freezable (it is actually not right) or change pipe_release()
>
> Is the bug that it will exit on the fake_signal.
Yes, I understand, but
> I don't think that bug will affects this patch though. I think this
> should all work if we add a check to freezer.c (or something similar
> that is cleaner).
>
> If you add SIGNAL_GROUP_COREDUMP check to freezer.c:
>
> static void fake_signal_wake_up(struct task_struct *p)
> {
> unsigned long flags;
>
> if (lock_task_sighand(p, &flags)) {
> - signal_wake_up(p, 0);
> + if (!p->signal->flags & SIGNAL_GROUP_COREDUMP)
> + signal_wake_up(p, 0);
> unlock_task_sighand(p, &flags);
> }
> }
>
> And change the wait_event_freezekillable() in this patch to just
> wait_event_freezable(), shouldn't that just work.
I doubt,
> The fake signal will never get sent.
Yes but try_to_freeze_tasks() can fail.
And once again, if wait_event_freezable() was correct we do not care
about the fake signal (in wait_for_dump_helper), so we do not need
to change fake_signal_wake_up. So perhaps we should fix it but this
needs some discussion.
Sorry again for the terse reply (and perhaps I misunderstood you),
I'll try to return to this problem asap. In any case I still think
we should do the freezer fixes on top of signal fixes I sent, and
you seem to agree. Good ;)
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-19 19:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-16 9:53 [PATCH 1/5] vfork: don't freezer_count() for in-kernel users of CLONE_VFORK Mandeep Singh Baines
2013-02-16 9:53 ` [PATCH 2/5] lockdep: check that no locks held at freeze time Mandeep Singh Baines
2013-02-16 17:06 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-20 1:57 ` [PATCH v3] " Mandeep Singh Baines
2013-02-20 10:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-02-20 12:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-20 13:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-02-20 22:30 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-20 23:11 ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2013-02-20 23:17 ` [PATCH v4] " Mandeep Singh Baines
2013-02-20 23:24 ` Andrew Morton
2013-02-21 0:17 ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2013-02-21 0:20 ` Andrew Morton
2013-02-21 0:28 ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2013-02-21 0:42 ` Andrew Morton
2013-02-21 3:19 ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2013-02-21 3:17 ` [PATCH v5] " Mandeep Singh Baines
2013-02-21 15:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-21 16:24 ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2013-02-21 16:51 ` [PATCH v6] " Mandeep Singh Baines
2013-02-21 21:42 ` Andrew Morton
2013-02-21 21:57 ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2013-02-16 9:53 ` [PATCH 3/5] coredump: use a freezable_schedule for the coredump_finish wait Mandeep Singh Baines
2013-02-16 17:17 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-16 9:53 ` [PATCH 4/5] freezer: clear fake signal on exit from __refrigerator Mandeep Singh Baines
2013-02-16 17:06 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-16 17:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-20 18:09 ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2013-02-23 19:41 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-23 19:59 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-16 9:53 ` [PATCH 5/5] coredump: ignore non-fatal signals when core dumping to a pipe Mandeep Singh Baines
2013-02-16 17:10 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-16 19:46 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-18 23:55 ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2013-02-19 14:18 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-19 5:19 ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2013-02-19 14:27 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-19 19:33 ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2013-02-19 19:45 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2013-02-19 20:20 ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2013-02-20 23:30 ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2013-02-23 19:21 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-16 17:05 ` [PATCH 1/5] vfork: don't freezer_count() for in-kernel users of CLONE_VFORK Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-20 0:07 ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2013-02-20 1:41 ` Mandeep Singh Baines
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130219194517.GA9986@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=benchan@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=msb@chromium.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).