From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934478Ab3BTHmu (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Feb 2013 02:42:50 -0500 Received: from mail2.gnudd.com ([213.203.150.91]:61044 "EHLO mail.gnudd.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933765Ab3BTHms (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Feb 2013 02:42:48 -0500 Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 08:35:54 +0100 From: Alessandro Rubini To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: x86@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Davide Ciminaghi Subject: tip/x86/amba Message-ID: <20130220073554.GA10939@mail.gnudd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Organization: GnuDD, Device Drivers, Embedded Systems, Courses Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello Peter and maintainers. I wonder what are the plans for the branch x86/amba, part of the tip repository. Of the 7 patches in that branch, 2 are already upstream and the other 5 rebase perfectly (only conflicts are in the header stanzas). This is the reverse log from next to my current working tree: 0e7e31f DMA: PL330: use prefix in reg names to build under x86 1e8486a watchdog: sp805_wdt depends on ARM 6417077 mmc: Use the new 52b9f4e drivers/amba: add support for a PCI bridge d8d2313 x86: add CONFIG_ARM_AMBA, selected by STA2X11 They all have the proper acked and signed-off, as well as references to the original mailing list message by my mate Davide who submitted them. Shall I just wait for you to merge or shall I repost to the mailing lists? In the latte case, with or without the various ack/signoff? Thanks /alessandro