From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755097Ab3BUQmt (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Feb 2013 11:42:49 -0500 Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:60648 "EHLO cavan.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753076Ab3BUQms (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Feb 2013 11:42:48 -0500 Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 16:42:44 +0000 From: Matthew Garrett To: Linus Torvalds Cc: David Howells , Josh Boyer , Peter Jones , Vivek Goyal , Kees Cook , keyrings@linux-nfs.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Load keys from signed PE binaries Message-ID: <20130221164244.GA19625@srcf.ucam.org> References: <30665.1361461678@warthog.procyon.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mjg59@cavan.codon.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on cavan.codon.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 08:39:55AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 7:47 AM, David Howells wrote: > > > > Can you pull this patchset please? > > Not without a lot more discussion first. > > Quite frankly, this is f*cking moronic. The whole thing seems to be > designed around stupid interfaces, for completely moronic reasons. Why > should we do this? There's only one signing authority, and they only sign PE binaries. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org