From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Subject: [RFC patch 7/8] timekeeping: Implement a shadow timekeeper
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 22:51:40 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130221224231.174700473@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20130221220147.719832397@linutronix.de
[-- Attachment #1: timekeeping-implement-shadow-timekeeper.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4888 bytes --]
Use the shadow timekeeper to do the update_wall_time() adjustments and
then copy it over to the real timekeeper.
Keep the shadow timekeeper in sync when updating stuff outside of
update_wall_time().
This allows us to limit the timekeeper_seq hold time to the update of
the real timekeeper and the vsyscall data in the next patch.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
Index: linux-3.6/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
===================================================================
--- linux-3.6.orig/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ linux-3.6/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
static struct timekeeper timekeeper;
static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(timekeeper_lock);
static seqcount_t timekeeper_seq;
+static struct timekeeper shadow_timekeeper;
/* flag for if timekeeping is suspended */
int __read_mostly timekeeping_suspended;
@@ -224,7 +225,7 @@ int pvclock_gtod_unregister_notifier(str
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pvclock_gtod_unregister_notifier);
/* must hold timekeeper_lock */
-static void timekeeping_update(struct timekeeper *tk, bool clearntp)
+static void timekeeping_update(struct timekeeper *tk, bool clearntp, bool mirror)
{
if (clearntp) {
tk->ntp_error = 0;
@@ -232,6 +233,9 @@ static void timekeeping_update(struct ti
}
update_vsyscall(tk);
update_pvclock_gtod(tk);
+
+ if (mirror)
+ memcpy(&shadow_timekeeper, &timekeeper, sizeof(timekeeper));
}
/**
@@ -444,7 +448,7 @@ int do_settimeofday(const struct timespe
tk_set_xtime(tk, tv);
- timekeeping_update(tk, true);
+ timekeeping_update(tk, true, true);
write_seqcount_end(&timekeeper_seq);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&timekeeper_lock, flags);
@@ -488,7 +492,7 @@ int timekeeping_inject_offset(struct tim
tk_set_wall_to_mono(tk, timespec_sub(tk->wall_to_monotonic, *ts));
error: /* even if we error out, we forwarded the time, so call update */
- timekeeping_update(tk, true);
+ timekeeping_update(tk, true, true);
write_seqcount_end(&timekeeper_seq);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&timekeeper_lock, flags);
@@ -523,7 +527,7 @@ static int change_clocksource(void *data
if (old->disable)
old->disable(old);
}
- timekeeping_update(tk, true);
+ timekeeping_update(tk, true, true);
write_seqcount_end(&timekeeper_seq);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&timekeeper_lock, flags);
@@ -704,6 +708,8 @@ void __init timekeeping_init(void)
tmp.tv_nsec = 0;
tk_set_sleep_time(tk, tmp);
+ memcpy(&shadow_timekeeper, &timekeeper, sizeof(timekeeper));
+
write_seqcount_end(&timekeeper_seq);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&timekeeper_lock, flags);
}
@@ -760,7 +766,7 @@ void timekeeping_inject_sleeptime(struct
__timekeeping_inject_sleeptime(tk, delta);
- timekeeping_update(tk, true);
+ timekeeping_update(tk, true, true);
write_seqcount_end(&timekeeper_seq);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&timekeeper_lock, flags);
@@ -798,7 +804,7 @@ static void timekeeping_resume(void)
tk->clock->cycle_last = tk->clock->read(tk->clock);
tk->ntp_error = 0;
timekeeping_suspended = 0;
- timekeeping_update(tk, false);
+ timekeeping_update(tk, false, true);
write_seqcount_end(&timekeeper_seq);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&timekeeper_lock, flags);
@@ -1177,7 +1183,8 @@ static inline void old_vsyscall_fixup(st
static void update_wall_time(void)
{
struct clocksource *clock;
- struct timekeeper *tk = &timekeeper;
+ struct timekeeper *real_tk = &timekeeper;
+ struct timekeeper *tk = &shadow_timekeeper;
cycle_t offset;
int shift = 0, maxshift;
unsigned long flags;
@@ -1189,16 +1196,16 @@ static void update_wall_time(void)
if (unlikely(timekeeping_suspended))
goto out;
- clock = tk->clock;
+ clock = real_tk->clock;
#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_USES_GETTIMEOFFSET
- offset = tk->cycle_interval;
+ offset = real_tk->cycle_interval;
#else
offset = (clock->read(clock) - clock->cycle_last) & clock->mask;
#endif
/* Check if there's really nothing to do */
- if (offset < tk->cycle_interval)
+ if (offset < real_tk->cycle_interval)
goto out;
/*
@@ -1237,12 +1244,22 @@ static void update_wall_time(void)
/* Update clock->cycle_last with the new value */
clock->cycle_last = tk->cycle_last;
- timekeeping_update(tk, false);
+ /*
+ * Update the real timekeeper.
+ *
+ * We could avoid this memcpy by switching pointers, but that
+ * requires changes to all other timekeeper usage sites as
+ * well, i.e. move the timekeeper pointer getter into the
+ * spinlocked/seqcount protected sections. And we trade this
+ * memcpy under the timekeeper_seq against one before we start
+ * updating.
+ */
+ memcpy(real_tk, tk, sizeof(*tk));
+ timekeeping_update(real_tk, false, false);
out:
write_seqcount_end(&timekeeper_seq);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&timekeeper_lock, flags);
-
}
/**
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-21 22:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-21 22:51 [RFC patch 0/8] timekeeping: Implement shadow timekeeper to shorten in kernel reader side blocking Thomas Gleixner
2013-02-21 22:51 ` [RFC patch 2/8] timekeeping: Make jiffies_lock internal Thomas Gleixner
2013-02-21 22:51 ` [RFC patch 1/8] timekeeping: Calc stuff once Thomas Gleixner
2013-02-21 22:51 ` [RFC patch 3/8] timekeeping: Move lock out of timekeeper struct Thomas Gleixner
2013-02-21 22:51 ` [RFC patch 4/8] timekeeping: Split timekeeper_lock into lock and seqcount Thomas Gleixner
2013-02-21 22:51 ` [RFC patch 5/8] timekeeping: Store cycle_last value in timekeeper struct as well Thomas Gleixner
2013-02-21 22:51 ` [RFC patch 6/8] timekeeping: Delay update of clock->cycle_last Thomas Gleixner
2013-02-21 22:51 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2013-02-22 23:53 ` [RFC patch 7/8] timekeeping: Implement a shadow timekeeper John Stultz
2013-02-26 12:17 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-02-21 22:51 ` [RFC patch 8/8] timekeeping: Shorten seq_count region Thomas Gleixner
2013-02-21 23:06 ` [RFC patch 0/8] timekeeping: Implement shadow timekeeper to shorten in kernel reader side blocking Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130221224231.174700473@linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox