From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@chromium.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
adurbin@chromium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] freezer: clear fake signal on exit from __refrigerator
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 20:41:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130223194125.GB9405@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACBanvoArjZ=7rjXjt5fN6MrhLohPY7NAjQwhWepnMLZbqpHdQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 02/20, Mandeep Singh Baines wrote:
>
> I think we need something like this in order to be able to fix
> wait_event_freezable and friends. Here is one idea:
>
> #define __wait_event_freezable(wq, condition, ret) \
> do { \
> DEFINE_WAIT(__wait); \
> \
> for (;;) { \
> prepare_to_wait(&wq, &__wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); \
> if (condition) \
> break; \
> if (!signal_pending(current)) { \
> freezable_schedule();
...
> If you cleaned up the fake signal in __refrigerator()
Perhaps. Or we can add recalc_sigpending into wait_freezable().
But note that
if (!signal_pending(current))
freezable_schedule();
is not actually right, wait_event_freezable() should be interruptible,
but not by freezer.
And let me repeat, as for coredump this can only solve the problems in
wait_for_dump_handler(). As for other users, I simply do not see any
valid user today, so perhaps wait_event_freezable() should die... Or
I missed something.
I'll try to make the coredumping fixes tomorrow, then we discuss this
again.
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-23 19:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-16 9:53 [PATCH 1/5] vfork: don't freezer_count() for in-kernel users of CLONE_VFORK Mandeep Singh Baines
2013-02-16 9:53 ` [PATCH 2/5] lockdep: check that no locks held at freeze time Mandeep Singh Baines
2013-02-16 17:06 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-20 1:57 ` [PATCH v3] " Mandeep Singh Baines
2013-02-20 10:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-02-20 12:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-20 13:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-02-20 22:30 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-20 23:11 ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2013-02-20 23:17 ` [PATCH v4] " Mandeep Singh Baines
2013-02-20 23:24 ` Andrew Morton
2013-02-21 0:17 ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2013-02-21 0:20 ` Andrew Morton
2013-02-21 0:28 ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2013-02-21 0:42 ` Andrew Morton
2013-02-21 3:19 ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2013-02-21 3:17 ` [PATCH v5] " Mandeep Singh Baines
2013-02-21 15:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-02-21 16:24 ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2013-02-21 16:51 ` [PATCH v6] " Mandeep Singh Baines
2013-02-21 21:42 ` Andrew Morton
2013-02-21 21:57 ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2013-02-16 9:53 ` [PATCH 3/5] coredump: use a freezable_schedule for the coredump_finish wait Mandeep Singh Baines
2013-02-16 17:17 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-16 9:53 ` [PATCH 4/5] freezer: clear fake signal on exit from __refrigerator Mandeep Singh Baines
2013-02-16 17:06 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-16 17:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-20 18:09 ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2013-02-23 19:41 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2013-02-23 19:59 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-16 9:53 ` [PATCH 5/5] coredump: ignore non-fatal signals when core dumping to a pipe Mandeep Singh Baines
2013-02-16 17:10 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-16 19:46 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-18 23:55 ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2013-02-19 14:18 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-19 5:19 ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2013-02-19 14:27 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-19 19:33 ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2013-02-19 19:45 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-19 20:20 ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2013-02-20 23:30 ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2013-02-23 19:21 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-16 17:05 ` [PATCH 1/5] vfork: don't freezer_count() for in-kernel users of CLONE_VFORK Oleg Nesterov
2013-02-20 0:07 ` Mandeep Singh Baines
2013-02-20 1:41 ` Mandeep Singh Baines
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130223194125.GB9405@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=adurbin@chromium.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=msb@chromium.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).