public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
To: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Are there numa balancing topics scheduled for the incoming LSF?
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:35:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130225103534.GC4365@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJd=RBBwwjiBcfCe5wMSS8Dzz1tF=EfGsGMggH+A174yTKa9PA@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 03:34:17PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> Hello all
> 
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:03 AM, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> wrote:
> >> This is a pull request for "Automatic NUMA Balancing V11". The list
> >
> > Ok, guys, I've pulled this and pushed out. There were some conflicts
> > with both the VM changes and with the scheduler tree, but they were
> > pretty small and looked simple, so I fixed them up and hope they all
> > work.
> >
> > Anyway, hopefully we'll have a more real numa balancing for 3.9, and
> > this is still considered a reasonable base for that work.
> >
> And what is scheduled for 3.9?
> 

>From me, nothing. I spent most of this cycle handling bugs and was not
able to dedicate any time to NUMA balancing. I hope to go back to it at
some stage soon but there are some other issues that are a higher priority
for me right now unfortunately.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

      reply	other threads:[~2013-02-25 10:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-23  7:34 Are there numa balancing topics scheduled for the incoming LSF? Hillf Danton
2013-02-25 10:35 ` Mel Gorman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130225103534.GC4365@suse.de \
    --to=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=dhillf@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox