From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759857Ab3BYKfj (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2013 05:35:39 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:41111 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759822Ab3BYKfh (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2013 05:35:37 -0500 Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:35:34 +0000 From: Mel Gorman To: Hillf Danton Cc: Andrea Arcangeli , Ingo Molnar , Rik van Riel , LKML Subject: Re: Are there numa balancing topics scheduled for the incoming LSF? Message-ID: <20130225103534.GC4365@suse.de> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 03:34:17PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote: > Hello all > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Linus Torvalds > wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:03 AM, Mel Gorman wrote: > >> This is a pull request for "Automatic NUMA Balancing V11". The list > > > > Ok, guys, I've pulled this and pushed out. There were some conflicts > > with both the VM changes and with the scheduler tree, but they were > > pretty small and looked simple, so I fixed them up and hope they all > > work. > > > > Anyway, hopefully we'll have a more real numa balancing for 3.9, and > > this is still considered a reasonable base for that work. > > > And what is scheduled for 3.9? > >>From me, nothing. I spent most of this cycle handling bugs and was not able to dedicate any time to NUMA balancing. I hope to go back to it at some stage soon but there are some other issues that are a higher priority for me right now unfortunately. -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs