* Are there numa balancing topics scheduled for the incoming LSF?
@ 2013-02-23 7:34 Hillf Danton
2013-02-25 10:35 ` Mel Gorman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Hillf Danton @ 2013-02-23 7:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mel Gorman; +Cc: Andrea Arcangeli, Ingo Molnar, Rik van Riel, LKML
Hello all
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:03 AM, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> wrote:
>> This is a pull request for "Automatic NUMA Balancing V11". The list
>
> Ok, guys, I've pulled this and pushed out. There were some conflicts
> with both the VM changes and with the scheduler tree, but they were
> pretty small and looked simple, so I fixed them up and hope they all
> work.
>
> Anyway, hopefully we'll have a more real numa balancing for 3.9, and
> this is still considered a reasonable base for that work.
>
And what is scheduled for 3.9?
Thanks
Hillf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Are there numa balancing topics scheduled for the incoming LSF?
2013-02-23 7:34 Are there numa balancing topics scheduled for the incoming LSF? Hillf Danton
@ 2013-02-25 10:35 ` Mel Gorman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mel Gorman @ 2013-02-25 10:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hillf Danton; +Cc: Andrea Arcangeli, Ingo Molnar, Rik van Riel, LKML
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 03:34:17PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> Hello all
>
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:03 AM, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> wrote:
> >> This is a pull request for "Automatic NUMA Balancing V11". The list
> >
> > Ok, guys, I've pulled this and pushed out. There were some conflicts
> > with both the VM changes and with the scheduler tree, but they were
> > pretty small and looked simple, so I fixed them up and hope they all
> > work.
> >
> > Anyway, hopefully we'll have a more real numa balancing for 3.9, and
> > this is still considered a reasonable base for that work.
> >
> And what is scheduled for 3.9?
>
>From me, nothing. I spent most of this cycle handling bugs and was not
able to dedicate any time to NUMA balancing. I hope to go back to it at
some stage soon but there are some other issues that are a higher priority
for me right now unfortunately.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-02-25 10:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-02-23 7:34 Are there numa balancing topics scheduled for the incoming LSF? Hillf Danton
2013-02-25 10:35 ` Mel Gorman
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox