From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759321Ab3BYSmz (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2013 13:42:55 -0500 Received: from mail-pa0-f49.google.com ([209.85.220.49]:65220 "EHLO mail-pa0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754529Ab3BYSmv convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2013 13:42:51 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT To: Viresh Kumar , Guennadi Liakhovetski From: Mike Turquette In-Reply-To: Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: Message-ID: <20130225184245.14870.87335@quantum> User-Agent: alot/0.3.3+ Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: fix sign check of an unsigned variable in cpufreq-cpu0 Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:42:45 -0800 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Quoting Viresh Kumar (2013-02-25 04:09:47) > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski > wrote: > > A "< 0" test for an unsigned variable is meaningless, change the variable > > to signed. > > > > Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski > > --- > > > > stable? > > > > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c | 3 ++- > > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c > > index 52bf36d..e7bad3c 100644 > > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c > > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c > > @@ -44,7 +44,8 @@ static int cpu0_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, > > { > > struct cpufreq_freqs freqs; > > struct opp *opp; > > - unsigned long freq_Hz, volt = 0, volt_old = 0, tol = 0; > > + unsigned long volt = 0, volt_old = 0, tol = 0; > > + long freq_Hz; > > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar > > The disease is spread across a bigger region though. > > @Mike: clk_round_rate returns long and __clk_round_rate returns unsigned long > and clk_ops->round_rate returns long again.. Don't you see something > strange here? Yes, this is in my todo list. I have a branch with some relevant changes but I haven't posted it yet. Regards, Mike