From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759597Ab3BYVQf (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:16:35 -0500 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:58235 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757981Ab3BYVQd (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:16:33 -0500 Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 21:16:18 +0000 From: Al Viro To: Mark Fasheh Cc: Richard Weinberger , ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, ocfs2-user@oss.oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jlbec@evilplan.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, david@sigma-star.at Subject: Re: OCFS2 mainline state? Message-ID: <20130225211617.GF4503@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <512BCA9E.4090702@nod.at> <20130225211103.GA13510@wotan.suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130225211103.GA13510@wotan.suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 01:11:03PM -0800, Mark Fasheh wrote: > I've seen that patch actually and yes it should have been in mainline > already. I didn't see whether it's in -mm (Andrew is pickup up some of the > patches for us right now). > > I'll check and if it's not I'll try to send him a version of it today. Normally filesystem trees are fed to Linus... Or I can pick that patch via VFS tree (and send it to Linus tomorrow). There also had been Jan's ocfs2 patch a while ago; I picked only the VFS part of that series, ext* and IIRC xfs ones went to corresponding filesystem trees. Should I just pick the ocfs2 stuff from now on?