[ 68/86] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: fix host version read

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

3.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>

commit ef4d0888bb7e1b963880f086575081c3d39cad2d upstream.

When commit 95a2482 (mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: add basic imx6q usdhc
support) works around host version issue on imx6q, it gets the
register address fixup "reg ^= 2" lost for imx25/35/51/53 esdhc.
Thus, the controller version on these SoCs is wrongly identified
as v1 while it's actually v2.

Add the address fixup back and take a different approach to correct
imx6q host version, so that the host version read gets back to work
for all SoCs.

Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c |   19 +++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
@@ -232,15 +232,18 @@ static void esdhc_writel_le(struct sdhci
 
 static u16 esdhc_readw_le(struct sdhci_host *host, int reg)
 {
+	struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
+	struct pltfm_imx_data *imx_data = pltfm_host->priv;
+
 	if (unlikely(reg == SDHCI_HOST_VERSION)) {
-		u16 val = readw(host->ioaddr + (reg ^ 2));
-		/*
-		 * uSDHC supports SDHCI v3.0, but it's encoded as value
-		 * 0x3 in host controller version register, which violates
-		 * SDHCI_SPEC_300 definition.  Work it around here.
-		 */
-		if ((val & SDHCI_SPEC_VER_MASK) == 3)
-			return --val;
+		reg ^= 2;
+		if (is_imx6q_usdhc(imx_data)) {
+			/*
+			 * The usdhc register returns a wrong host version.
+			 * Correct it here.
+			 */
+			return SDHCI_SPEC_300;
+		}
 	}
 
 	return readw(host->ioaddr + reg);