From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751817Ab3B0Fbs (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Feb 2013 00:31:48 -0500 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:30413 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750713Ab3B0Fbq (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Feb 2013 00:31:46 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,746,1355126400"; d="scan'208";a="292357737" Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 11:01:09 +0530 From: Vinod Koul To: "Mark A. Greer" Cc: Tim Gardner , herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au, dmitry.kasatkin@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Tony Lindgren , linux-arm-kernel , linux-omap Subject: Re: crypto: omap-sham, omap-aes and dma_request_slave_channel_compat() Message-ID: <20130227053109.GA28537@intel.com> References: <512D00BE.8090204@canonical.com> <20130226225205.GA13338@animalcreek.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130226225205.GA13338@animalcreek.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 03:52:05PM -0700, Mark A. Greer wrote: > [CC'ing more people & lists.] > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:36:46AM -0700, Tim Gardner wrote: > > Whats up with commits 0e87e73f4abe1ada69cf780fe2550c6361a1b53b and > > b4b87a934c30fb91cbdd18ae028acdc361e1cf0f. As far as I can tell, > > dma_request_slave_channel_compat() does not exist in 3.9 as of > > 52caa59ed335616c5254adff7911465a57ed9f14, nor does it exist in > > linux-next as of Feb 26. Am I just being dense ? > > Yeah, order got a little messed up. The problem is known and the > sub-thread talking about it starts about here: > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg225241.html > > with the conclusion (AFAICT) that Vinod is to push it: > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg226062.html > > > Reverting those 2 commits at least allows the compile complete. > > When the dependencies are sorted out, will you revert the revert > or do I need to do something? Yes we had agreed that I will send it. I have applied this one now, and will send second PULL request to Linus soon. Arnd, The second patch of dw_dmac you wnated to send me fails to apply for me. Can you either rebase or send with your updates with my ack? Either ways let me know -- ~Vinod